Teams

Buckhorn Sweetspots Spring - S. Newsom

2025 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-19vs Palma Ceia Ad Outs - E. KempLost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Sverdlow / Sara Newsom vs Lindsey Bradbury / Lyda Lindell4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-05-15vs Hills/Parmer/40&Over3.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesSara Newsom / Stacy Durbin vs Amy Parmer / Bridget Pastore4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-05vs Buckhorn Matchmakers - C. SullivanLost 01
L#1 DoublesSTEPHANIE Hardin / Sara Newsom vs Erin Lobner / Erin Posey6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Durbin / Sara Newsom vs Melissa Henderson / Nicole Gomez6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-14vs Yachty by Nature - J. FrostLost 01
L#2 DoublesSara Newsom / Kelly Rittenhouse vs Julianne Frost / Natalie Schaap5-7, 1-6
2025-04-07vs RH Get A Grip! - L. HarrarLost 01
L#3 DoublesSara Newsom / Melissa Wolczak vs Laurie Harrar / Lisa Pascoli1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Michelle Butler
published
2.96
Melissa Bryan
published
2.93
STEPHANIE Hardin
published
2.88
Melissa Wolczak
published
2.83
Merbaliz Ferris
published
2.83
Kim Sverdlow
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.80
Susan MOSHER
published
2.73
Kelly Rittenhouse
published
2.73
Sara Newsom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Carrie Elwell
published 3
2.52
Barbara Kouimanis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Rittenhouse + Carrie Elwell1639% games−5.2% vs expected
Kim Sverdlow + Michelle Butler314 matchesnot enough data
STEPHANIE Hardin + Kim Sverdlow213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Butler
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Melissa Bryan
29W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
STEPHANIE Hardin
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Melissa Wolczak
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Merbaliz Ferris
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
Kim Sverdlow
21W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
Susan MOSHER
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Kelly Rittenhouse
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Sara Newsom
83W–79L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Carrie Elwell
5W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Barbara Kouimanis
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.