Teams

MVH Burnet SSL A40-3.5W

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A40&O 3.5 W (6 player)

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2022-06-01vs MVC Cole SSL A40-3.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesKerri Stoel / Marta Stanley vs Rennae Cole / Anne Neis7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatie Hartgerink / Mary Burnet vs Gretchen Asfour / Judy Siegel2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlice Zlotucha / Tina Kanis vs Brenda Bezinque / Lisa Kerr6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-05-18vs ML Ring SSL A40-3.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesLuann Mullen / Katie Hartgerink vs Kathleen Stockall / Cari Virkus6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKerri Stoel / Alice Zlotucha vs Kelly Boyle / Jamie Hartman Ring6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLeann Engles / Mary Elling vs Patti Congleton / Soogee Ahn0-6, 1-6
2022-05-11vs MY Griggs SSL A40-3.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesLuann Mullen / Marta Stanley vs Diane Langejans / Susan Pritchard6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMary Burnet / Katie Hartgerink vs Sarah Sandell / Betty Trebing2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLeann Engles / Alice Zlotucha vs Christine Douma / Lynn Griggs7-5, 6-3
2022-05-04vs HC Needham SSL A40-3.5WWon 21
L#1 DoublesLuann Mullen / Marta Stanley vs Sarah Bast / Nicole Fender6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKatie Hartgerink / Mary Burnet vs Michelle Daane / Theresa Cusworth6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKerri Stoel / Tina Kanis vs Patricia Dalman / Kathy Collins6-0, 7-6
2022-04-20vs MVS Stevens SSL A40-3.5WWon 30
W#1 DoublesLuann Mullen / Marta Stanley vs OPHIE FIX / Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold6-4, 5-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Hartgerink / Kerri Stoel vs Alyssa Vandenberg / Lillian Jackson6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Hayes / Tina Kanis vs Linda Thomason / Cindy Vander Ploeg6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-23vs PA Applehof SSL A40-3.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Hartgerink / Mary Burnet vs Cynthia Swain / Ruth Kohley7-6, 5-4
W#2 DoublesLuann Mullen / Tina Kanis vs Mary Burdo / Cara Dykstra4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeslie Hayes / Alice Zlotucha vs Volita Vinoski / Tracy Sodini5-7, 5-5
2022-03-09vs PY Fogarty SSL A40-3.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesLuann Mullen / Marta Stanley vs Glorianna Fogarty / Dana Cunningham6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Burnet / Katie Hartgerink vs Elizabeth Lekosiotis / Holly Edick6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLeslie Hayes / Tina Kanis vs Becky Bach / Donna Weber6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-02-23vs WH Scheonrock SSL A40-3.5WWon 21
L#1 DoublesKatie Hartgerink / Mary Burnet vs Lee Ann Scheonrock / Stephanie Rex3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLeann Engles / Luann Mullen vs Patricia Guernsey / Gale Nicholson6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKerri Stoel / Tina Kanis vs Susan Bailey / Margaret Zahrai7-6, 6-3
2022-02-09vs MVS Huizenga SSL A40-3.5WWon 30
W#1 DoublesLuann Mullen / Marta Stanley vs Mia Helweg / Laura Huizenga7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatie Hartgerink / Mary Burnet vs Barb Cribar / Tracy Missad6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTina Kanis / Kerri Stoel vs Mary McMahon / Rachel Ogilvie6-3, 6-2
2021-05-28vs MVS Stevens SSL A40-3.5WWon 31
W#1 SinglesLuann Mullen vs Brenda Stagg6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatie Hartgerink / Marta Stanley vs Tinker Judson / Rachel Ogilvie6-4, 5-4
L#2 SinglesTina Kanis vs Shannon Smith4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Casarez-Heyda / Sandra Price vs Nancy McDonald / Kate Vincent7-6, 5-3
2021-04-30vs PY Fogarty SSL A40-3.5WWon 30
W#1 SinglesLuann Mullen vs Jill Barnum6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristina Casarez-Heyda / Katie Hartgerink vs Dana Cunningham / Glorianna Fogarty6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarta Stanley / Mary Burnet vs Elizabeth Lekosiotis / Linda Scannell6-2, 6-4
2021-03-19vs MVS Huizenga SSL A40-3.5WWon 31
W#1 SinglesLuann Mullen vs Shannon Smith6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristina Casarez-Heyda / Marta Stanley vs Heather Garbaty / Nancy McDonald6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesTina Kanis vs Mia Helweg2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMary Burnet / Rachel Schipper vs Mary McMahon / Rachel Ogilvie6-4, 6-1
2021-02-19vs PY Fogarty SSL A40-3.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristina Casarez-Heyda / Katie Hartgerink vs Glorianna Fogarty / Donna Weber7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLuann Mullen / Marta Stanley vs Elizabeth Lekosiotis / Margaret Rohs6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · WMI SSL A40&O 3.5 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVH Burnet SSL A40-3.5W8119820234
2PA Applehof SSL A40-3.5W63161123228
3HC Needham SSL A40-3.5W54171026232
4ML Ring SSL A40-3.5W54171027240
5MVC Cole SSL A40-3.5W54151227241
6MY Griggs SSL A40-3.5W54151228232
7PY Fogarty SSL A40-3.5W45131433263
8MVS Stevens SSL A40-3.5W36121533255
9WH Scheonrock SSL A40-3.5W3691835275
10MVS Huizenga SSL A40-3.5W1822550310

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Kerri Stoel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Luann Mullen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Marta Stanley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.04
Leslie Hayes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Susan Griffith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Tina Kanis
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
2.70
Alice Zlotucha
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Katie Hartgerink
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Leann Engles
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Burnet
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Mary Elling
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Sandra Price
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Kanis + Kerri Stoel8163% games+14.3% vs expected
Tina Kanis + Leslie Hayes4454% games+5.6% vs expected
Katie Hartgerink + Mary Burnet332053% games+2.2% vs expected
Alice Zlotucha + Tina Kanis3545% games+1.6% vs expected
Mary Burnet + Luann Mullen5357% games+0.4% vs expected
Tina Kanis + Katie Hartgerink21038% games+0.3% vs expected
Alice Zlotucha + Mary Burnet241852% games−0.8% vs expected
Marta Stanley + Luann Mullen191154% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerri Stoel
91W–48L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Luann Mullen
193W–129L career · 12 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
Marta Stanley
72W–103L career · 10 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Leslie Hayes
28W–66L career · 3 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Susan Griffith
42W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
Tina Kanis
38W–65L career · 11 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Alice Zlotucha
73W–114L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Katie Hartgerink
76W–84L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leann Engles
17W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Burnet
104W–89L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Elling
5W–12L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Price
19W–36L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.