Teams

SD 4.0 Coronado Cays (2:2)/ Hammond

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD WD · SD - Women - 4.0 WD

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesKristin Adams / Debra Reilly vs Sandra Lopez / NORA TORRES7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDiana Kirkland vs Mia Vaughnes1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElsie Hammond / Jennifer Vanderhyden vs Clara Huerta / Fabiola Flores1-6, 0-6
2023-03-22vs SD 4.0 La Jolla TC (3:1)/ BourneLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Vanderhyden / Elsie Hammond vs Maria Ward / Terri Bourne3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTugce Varol vs Nina Keller4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJoan Fahrenthold / Diana Kirkland vs Dominique Gambale / Becky Kuba3-6, 0-6
2023-03-08vs SD 4.0 Mtn View (2:2)/ McLellanSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLinda la Terza / MinhTam Flynn vs Chigusa Okubo / Miho Nakajima6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTugce Varol vs Veronica Ruffo6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKari Ursitti / Kelli Marovish vs Rosie Wagner / Michiyo Killeen2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElsie Hammond / Jennifer Vanderhyden vs Bea McLellan / Gina White2-6, 5-7
2023-02-15vs SD 4.0 SDTRC (2:2)/ HansonWon 31
W#1 DoublesMinhTam Flynn / Linda la Terza vs Ashley Stone / Jennie Blacker6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesElsie Hammond vs Darci Pani0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Adams / Debra Reilly vs Diane Holnback / Carol Harris6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Nichols / Kelli Marovish vs Christina Stow / Chris Daher6-4, 7-6
2023-02-01vs SD 4.0 Peninsula TC (2:2)/ KroegerLost 03
L#1 DoublesMinhTam Flynn / Linda la Terza vs Shane Rose / Karen Brown4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Kirkland vs Kim Latham3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLori Roth / Elsie Hammond vs Melissa Kroeger / Regan Brown6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-01-25vs SD 4.0 Mtn View (2:2)/ WunderlyLost 13
W#1 DoublesMinhTam Flynn / Linda la Terza vs Ryoko Adachi / Nan Kim6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDiana Kirkland vs Maru Vega3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElsie Hammond / Jennifer Vanderhyden vs Mina Tsuya / April Guerieri6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKari Ursitti / Kelli Marovish vs Julie Wunderly / Inge Bisconer2-6, 1-6
2023-01-18vs SD 4.0 SDTRC (2:2)/ OttWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Vanderhyden / Elsie Hammond vs Gayle Kehrli / Jennifer Knightly3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTugce Varol vs Gretchen Shaffer6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Adams / Debra Reilly vs Gayle Nuffer / Carol Diggs6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKathy Nichols / Diana Kirkland vs Ana Mariela Gamiz / Carrie Musicant3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesElsie Hammond / Tugce Varol vs Debbie McBride / Marcia Bennett3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesDiana Kirkland vs Colleen Warren1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMinhTam Flynn / Linda la Terza vs Esther Leeflang / Jill Lehr7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTeresa Bear / Lori Roth vs Deborah Boehm / Kristin Ryner1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Linda la Terza
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
MinhTam Flynn
published
3.65
Debra Reilly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Kristin Adams
published
3.64
Diana Kirkland
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Lori Roth
published
3.55
Jennifer Vanderhyden
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.47
Teresa Bear
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Elsie Hammond
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.40
Tugce Varol
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.39
Kelli Marovish
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Connie Kocherga
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelli Marovish + Elsie Hammond91052% games+8.3% vs expected
Teresa Bear + Lori Roth6444% games+5.8% vs expected
Debra Reilly + Jennifer Vanderhyden61249% games+0.1% vs expected
Elsie Hammond + Tugce Varol92641% games−6.5% vs expected
Jennifer Vanderhyden + Elsie Hammond31140% games−15.7% vs expected
Debra Reilly + Elsie Hammond2538% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Vanderhyden + Tugce Varol2442% gamesnot enough data
Kelli Marovish + Tugce Varol224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Linda la Terza
121W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
MinhTam Flynn
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Debra Reilly
121W–145L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
Kristin Adams
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Diana Kirkland
47W–102L career · 6 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
Lori Roth
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Jennifer Vanderhyden
59W–104L career · 5 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Teresa Bear
87W–45L career · 1 line in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Elsie Hammond
66W–161L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
4
Tugce Varol
56W–91L career · 4 lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Kelli Marovish
96W–74L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Connie Kocherga
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.