Teams

BC - MiraCosta/KarieLanterman

2022 SOCAL Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.11 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-12-04vs BC - PVTC/LizaKoLost 01
L#3 DoublesIngrid Leon / Ina Setiadji vs Christine Anderson / Olga Stepanenko6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2022-11-20vs BC - MCC/AmandaWestLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarion Doi / Ingrid Leon vs Pamela Lopez / Janet Zuccarini2-6, 0-6
2022-11-12vs BC - MCC/AmandaWestWon 10
W#2 DoublesCeleste Torres / Ingrid Leon vs Kathi Colligan / Staci Carey6-1, 7-5
2022-09-25vs BC - Kramer/MicheleFranchettWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeborah Russell / Karie Lanterman vs Michele Franchett / Sarah Pucci6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Celeste Torres
published 3.5
3.30
Darin Nizich
published 3.5
3.08
Sonomi Deguchi
published
2.93
Romi Worst
published
2.83
Deborah Russell
published 3
2.82
Toni Bianco
published
2.76
Katherine Rice
published
2.75
Ester Fungladda
published 3
2.74
Ingrid Leon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Sharon Alston
published 3
2.68
Karie Lanterman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Soo Fujishige
published
2.65
Anne Umamoto
published 3
2.53
2.49
Lan Vera
published
Sharon Bradley
published
Stacy Becker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ingrid Leon + Karie Lanterman151649% games−1.6% vs expected
Katherine Rice + Sharon Alston3546% games−11.2% vs expected
Ingrid Leon + Sharon Alston3746% gamesnot enough data
Soo Fujishige + Sharon Bradley4353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Celeste Torres
46W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Darin Nizich
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Sonomi Deguchi
2W–16L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
Romi Worst
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Deborah Russell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Toni Bianco
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Katherine Rice
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Ester Fungladda
2W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Ingrid Leon
73W–128L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Sharon Alston
48W–58L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Karie Lanterman
137W–186L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Soo Fujishige
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Anne Umamoto
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Christine McFarland
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
2.53
Lan Vera
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.49
Sharon Bradley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacy Becker
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.