Teams

LVTA ORANGE

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-14vs HMTC PURPLESplit 11
W#2 DoublesJill Brooks / Nancy Pflughoeft vs Teresa Adsit / Christine Richardson2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGina Solanyk / Sue Schneider vs Diane Westlind / Renee Adams2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-06-07vs TAG MAROONLost 12
W#1 DoublesJudy O'Gorman / Dawn Hagen vs Becky Buhler / Larea Warden6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDena Stark / Karen Pielin vs Ann Smerud / Jacalyn Petersen1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesGina Solanyk / Connie Erickson vs Falguni Gill / Janice Mossberg3-6, 5-7
2023-05-31vs CSU GREENSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDebbie Hansen / Judy O'Gorman vs Celeste Blackburn / Sara Mullarkey3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Pielin / Sue Schneider vs Susan Davidson / Leticia Dunn6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-24vs FCCC WHITESplit 11
L#2 DoublesDebbie Hansen / Dena Stark vs Karen Preiss / Jennifer Camp1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJudy O'Gorman / Nancy Pflughoeft vs Kristine Clagett / Theresa Unfug6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-17vs MLF REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesJudy O'Gorman / Karen Pielin vs Janet Gugliotto / Denise Andrews1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-10vs HMTC PINKWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Debbie Hansen vs Mary Gabiola / Judy Stout6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Pielin / Gina Solanyk vs Marne Engelking / Kathi Freemann6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDena Stark / Sue Schneider vs Linda Berkheim / Patti Ingels6-3, 6-4
2023-05-03vs WYO BROWNSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJill Brooks / Dena Stark vs Patricia Hansen / Judith Loomis6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSue Schneider / Nancy Pflughoeft vs Pennie Weir / Cindy Schultz6-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jill Brooks
published
3.41
Connie Erickson
published 3.5
3.37
Debbie Hansen
published 3.5
Dawn Hagen
published 3.5
3.25
Judy O'Gorman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Karen Pielin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Dena Stark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.94
Nancy Pflughoeft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.69
Sue Schneider
published
2.65
Gina Solanyk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Christina Whalen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Pielin + Gina Solanyk5448% games+5.1% vs expected
Judy O'Gorman + Nancy Pflughoeft3746% games−3.7% vs expected
Judy O'Gorman + Karen Pielin123 matchesnot enough data
Judy O'Gorman + Dawn Hagen213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Pielin + Dena Stark123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Brooks
34W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.60
3.5
Connie Erickson
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Debbie Hansen
24W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Dawn Hagen
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Judy O'Gorman
58W–79L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Karen Pielin
65W–98L career · 4 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Dena Stark
93W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
3.5
Nancy Pflughoeft
60W–97L career · 4 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.94
Sue Schneider
3W–20L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Gina Solanyk
13W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
2.65
Christina Whalen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.