Teams

6-JRussell-DFC

2024 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-08vs 5-MHolt-HSLost 01
L#1 DoublesBruce Elvin / Evan Fuguet vs Mike Kempel / Michael Holt1-6, 3-6
2024-09-28vs 1-MBland-CHTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesRodney Radtke / Evan Fuguet vs Robert Kern / Bill Stewart6-4, 6-2
2024-09-24vs 4-ROakley-EVWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Monroe / Evan Fuguet vs Will Johnson / Tom Luben6-4, 7-6
2024-08-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Parker / Evan Fuguet vs Michael Lemanski / Michael Klein6-2, 6-4
2024-08-20vs 4-ROakley-EVLost 01
L#2 DoublesEvan Fuguet / Christopher Monroe vs Chris Reeves / Reggie Oakley6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-08-17vs 3-PHariharan-ENOWon 10
W#3 DoublesEvan Fuguet / Bruce Elvin vs Shri Prakashan Parapalli / Vimal Kumar6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bruce Elvin
published 3.5
3.18
Daniel Ennis
published 3.5
3.12
Adam Rust
published 3.5
3.06
Andrew Parker
published 3.5
3.04
Evan Fuguet
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Matthew Sears
published
2.98
STUART KNECHTLE
published
Hank Kistler
published
Jeff Russell
published
Merrick Bernstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evan Fuguet + Matthew Sears3640% games−3.5% vs expected
Adam Rust + Evan Fuguet044 matchesnot enough data
Hank Kistler + Bruce Elvin033 matchesnot enough data
Evan Fuguet + Andrew Parker033 matchesnot enough data
Evan Fuguet + Christopher Monroe123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bruce Elvin
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Daniel Ennis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Adam Rust
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Andrew Parker
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Evan Fuguet
18W–39L career · 6 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.04
Matthew Sears
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
STUART KNECHTLE
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Christopher Monroe
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Hank Kistler
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeff Russell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Merrick Bernstein
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.