Teams

SAL-Stembridge

2023 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over Winter · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-25vs WW-DeanWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Kearfott / George Pickral vs Erin Gardner / Michael Flynn6-1, 6-0
2023-03-12vs HERM-ChessonWon 10
W#1 DoublesGeorge Pickral / Julie Kearfott vs Richard Locke / Jessica Tindel6-1, 7-5
2023-02-19vs BURK-SweeneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Kearfott / George Pickral vs Kasey Booth / Michael Jernigan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-02-05vs ACAC-RalstonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Kearfott / George Pickral vs Jean Davis / Bennett Lee6-0, 6-3
2023-01-21vs MTC-MartinWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Kevin Hennessy vs Kathleen Laroche / Kenneth Adams6-3, 6-2
2023-01-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Kearfott / George Pickral vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Charles Means
published 4
3.41
Craig Leahy
published 3.5
3.40
Mandy Tornabene
published
3.33
Julie Kearfott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.12
Katie Fondren
published
3.09
Carla Shaffer
published 3.5
2.92
Dan Stembridge
published 3
2.86
Kimberly Means
published
2.86
Kimberly Stembridge
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Means + Kimberly Means314 matchesnot enough data
Dan Stembridge + Kimberly Stembridge123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charles Means
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.76
3.5
Craig Leahy
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Mandy Tornabene
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Julie Kearfott
146W–104L career · 12 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Katie Fondren
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.12
3.5
Carla Shaffer
23W–29L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Dan Stembridge
21W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
Kimberly Means
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Elizabeth Hennessy
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
2.86
Kimberly Stembridge
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.