Teams

Hold Team

2026 Adult 40 & Over Women Spring Day - Mobile · 2.5 Women Spring Day 40+

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Spring Day 40+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Mary Brake
published
2.33
Kristain Ledford
published
2.29
Allison Middleton
published 2.5
2.28
Mary Hadley
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Haley Rubey
published 2.5
2.04
Shilpa Burkett
published
1.98
Cheyanne Strickland
published 2.5
1.95
Catherine Madden
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Brake
7W–22L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kristain Ledford
18W–26L career · no lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Allison Middleton
14W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Mary Hadley
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Haley Rubey
19W–26L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Shilpa Burkett
2W–9L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Cheyanne Strickland
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
2.5
Catherine Madden
9W–20L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.