Teams

Nguyen - Stringing Winners

2024 Loudoun Tri-Level 18 & Over Men · Loudoun Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-09-18vs Tiong - Team CourtmastersLost 01
L#1 DoublesHung Le / Ivan Kozliak vs Jason Pallady / Blake Taylor1-6, 3-6
2024-09-14vs Cummins - ChallengersWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Jacob / Tan Nguyen vs Anup Dandekar / Lakshmi Sateesh Kommineni6-4, 6-2
2024-09-09vs LOUDOUN - CebulashLost 01
L#1 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Scott Jacob vs Quinn Fiscus / Sandipp Rou Perepu0-6, 3-6
2024-09-05vs Tiong - Team CourtmastersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesScott Jacob / Edward Xin vs Vijay Kalanadhabhatta / Jason Hecker5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Ziemnick / Hung Le vs Rishi Malhotra / Tejinder Sagoo1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-04vs LOUDOUN - CebulashLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Jacob / Edward Xin vs Quinn Fiscus / Murugavel Chengalvarayan4-6, 1-6
2024-08-29vs Cummins - ChallengersWon 10
W#2 DoublesHung Le / Praveen Mullacherry vs Louis Dupuis / Scott Johnson6-4, 6-3
2024-08-17vs LOUDOUN - NguyenLost 01
L#1 DoublesEdward Xin / Scott Jacob vs Vijeaswaran Velusamy / JANAK MEHTA2-6, 1-6
2024-08-09vs Cummins - ChallengersWon 10
W#1 DoublesEdward Xin / Ivan Kozliak vs Benjamin Canfield / Lakshmi Sateesh Kommineni7-6, 6-2
2024-08-03vs LOUDOUN - CebulashLost 02
L#1 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Scott Jacob vs Murugavel Chengalvarayan / Otarhe Okoh3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHung Le / Praveen Mullacherry vs Paul Ebersole / James Herbert3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Edward Xin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Ivan Kozliak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Scott Jacob
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Hung Le
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.77
Luan Nguyen
published
2.69
Sameer Farah
published
Praveen Mullacherry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Xin + Scott Jacob044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edward Xin
95W–50L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Ivan Kozliak
300W–288L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Scott Jacob
69W–80L career · 6 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Hung Le
44W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.41
Luan Nguyen
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Sameer Farah
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Praveen Mullacherry
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.