Teams

VALLEY VISTA RC/VVRC COURTS 65AW9.0A

2025 ADULT 65&Over · Women's 9.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-21vs NorCal/Rennert/65&Over9.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesThea Horii / Elaine Hennessy vs Kathleen Haigood / Cynthia Abel2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Snowden / Beth Hostetler vs Sally Cella / Amy Rennert1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarlane Cook / Ellen Carlton vs Kristen Stanton / Cecilia Arnold4-6, 2-6
2025-05-20vs NorCal/Rennert/65&Over9.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesKal Peters / Lisa Snowden vs Kathleen Haigood / Cynthia Abel5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesThea Horii / Elizabeth Adams vs Paula Moser / Christine Tennant2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElaine Hennessy / Marlane Cook vs Sally Cella / Karla Barnette2-6, 2-6
2025-04-09vs NorCal/Rennert/65&Over9.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesThea Horii / Elaine Hennessy vs Paula Moser / Christine Tennant3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Snowden / Lisa Hotchkiss vs Cynthia Abel / Lynn Stanghellini3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBeth Hostetler / Kal Peters vs Leslie Airola-Murveit / Andrea Barnes0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Elaine Hennessy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Lisa Snowden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.01
Beth Hostetler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.98
Kal Peters
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Thea Horii
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ellen Carlton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.20
Dolores Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Lisa Hotchkiss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marlane Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Hennessy + Dolores Schmidt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elaine Hennessy
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
4.10
Lisa Snowden
10W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Beth Hostetler
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
Kal Peters
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.98
Thea Horii
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.76
4
Ellen Carlton
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dolores Schmidt
7W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Lisa Hotchkiss
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marlane Cook
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.