Teams

Bethany Bounds

2026 TriLevel 18&over-NE · Women 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-13vs ScarboroughWon 21
L#1 DoublesDanielle Arnsdorff / Bethany Bounds vs Michelle Lindsey / Morris Kelly Snyder3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesErin Jones / Carley Johnston vs Amanda Sullivan / Hester Lowe4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKayla Reynolds / Lacey Harden vs Alicia Milstead / Lauren Zuelzke6-2, 6-1
2026-08-02vs ScarboroughLost 12
L#1 DoublesBethany Bounds / Lexi Chism vs Kelly Young / Morris Kelly Snyder3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKelli Smith / Reika Sato vs Hester Lowe / Briley Clement6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJoy Whittle / Shelby Miller vs Ashton Scarborough / Nena Lowe2-6, 0-6
2026-07-28vs ScarboroughLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoy Whittle / Kayla Reynolds vs Nena Lowe / Ashton Scarborough3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesReika Sato / Carley Johnston vs Suzanne Cervantes / Michelle Lindsey7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBethany Bounds / Anna Credille vs Kelly Young / Morris Kelly Snyder1-6, 1-6
2026-07-14vs ScarboroughLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Credille / Danielle Arnsdorff vs Morris Kelly Snyder / Briley Clement0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarley Johnston / Erin Jones vs Michelle Lindsey / Suzanne Cervantes2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLacey Harden / Shelby Miller vs Elizabeth Barnitz / Nena Lowe0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-07-08vs ScarboroughWon 21
L#1 DoublesDanielle Arnsdorff / Lexi Chism vs Briley Clement / Kelly Young4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKelli Smith / Susanne Lindsey vs Amanda Sullivan / Elise Mcmasters6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKayla Reynolds / Joy Whittle vs Ashton Scarborough / Lauren Zuelzke1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Danielle Arnsdorff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.25
Anna Credille
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.16
Susanne Lindsey
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.91
Carley Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.85
Reika Sato
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Kelli Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Lexi Chism
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Lacey Harden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Kayla Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Joy Whittle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kayla Reynolds + Joy Whittle6357% games+15.3% vs expected
Carley Johnston + Reika Sato213 matchesnot enough data
Joy Whittle + Reika Sato303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danielle Arnsdorff
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
4
Anna Credille
0W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.25
Susanne Lindsey
43W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.16
3.5
Carley Johnston
12W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.91
Reika Sato
33W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.85
Kelli Smith
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Lexi Chism
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Lacey Harden
24W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%5%95%
2.73
Kayla Reynolds
37W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.60
Joy Whittle
36W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%27%73%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.