← Teams

SAC-Marsh

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.56 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Kristie Leake
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.82
Teresa Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Timothea Barnatan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Julie Legassick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Michael Leake
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Robin Fernstrom
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Jeff Legassick
published 3
—
Tim Fernstrom
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Todd Spear
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results8 ties
2019-12-06Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMichael Leake / Julie Legassick vs Jeff Anhaltzer / Nancy Osborne4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephen Marsh / Timothea Barnatan vs Anil Khanna / Kristin Bialobok6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2019-11-16Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMary Marsh / Michael Leake vs Autumn Gray / Anh Ngo6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Legassick / Stephen Marsh vs Megan McCarter / Duy Nguyen6-1, 6-1
2019-10-27Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTim Fernstrom / Timothea Barnatan vs Kim Wheeler / Jim Wheeler7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKristie Leake / Michael Leake vs Tami McAra / Ben Yamaguchi6-3, 6-2
2019-10-13Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJulie Legassick / Todd Spear vs Margot Wolfsehr / Kendall Acheson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobin Fernstrom / Stephen Marsh vs Courtney Mersereau / Chris Shepard6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTimothea Barnatan / David Aman vs Andrew Smith / Jennifer Stevenson6-1, 6-2
2019-10-05Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKristie Leake / Stephen Marsh vs JANE LENG / Rich Rice7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobin Fernstrom / Todd Spear vs Maritess Mayer / Richard Press3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-09-22Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMary Marsh / Michael Leake vs Elise Anderson / Chris Collins6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesStephen Marsh / Julie Legassick vs Kristen Kopack / Larry Hermida6-3, 6-1
2019-09-15Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKristie Leake / Stephen Marsh vs Kalynn Belden / Paul Stutzman6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTeresa Sullivan / Michael Leake vs Hideko Kershaw / Shiva Hogalagere6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRobin Fernstrom / Michael Sullivan vs Sandra Ellis / David Lomartire6-4, 6-2
2019-09-13Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKristie Leake / Stephen Marsh vs Jacqui Slominski / Dan Bingham6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTeresa Sullivan / Todd Spear vs Elicia Putnam / Roger Dehoog6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTimothea Barnatan / Tim Fernstrom vs Amy Thomas / Oscar Polo6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Kristie Leake
126W–83L career · type A
26%74%0%
3.95
4
Teresa Sullivan
112W–57L career
0%98%1%
3.82
3.5
Timothea Barnatan
95W–117L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
Julie Legassick
32W–33L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Michael Leake
16W–40L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Robin Fernstrom
48W–36L career
not enough data
—
3
Jeff Legassick
31W–47L career
not enough data
—
3
Tim Fernstrom
20W–31L career
not enough data
—
0
Todd Spear
23W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.