Teams

KY/LOU/DASHTI

2024 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 4.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.93 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-02vs KY/LOU/ACKERMANSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHelen Dashti / Madge Dennis vs Rose Shuck / Nancy MacMillan1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Kane-Liu vs Beth Salamon7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBetsy Touma / Denise Roby vs Aimee Ackermann / Karen Mueller2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesStefanie Nasca / Anna Feitelson vs Dana Wyssbrod / Angela Clark3-6, 3-6
2024-02-25vs KY/LOU/THOMPSON/TOMESLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Kane-Liu / Amy Dishman vs Kim Cox / Marnie Ochoa3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Roby / Elizabeth Bowling vs Caroline Clark / Missy Jeffers4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Snook / Angela Beyerle vs Morgan Bauer / Ellen Stubbs0-6, 0-6
2024-02-17vs KY/LOU/AFTENIE/MATANICHLost 13
L#1 DoublesShannon Budnick / Betsy Touma vs Livia Aftenie / Jennifer Goselin0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHelen Dashti vs Sarah Keith2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Snook / Angela Beyerle vs Jody Shaikun / Dana Ahern1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Kane-Liu / Anna Feitelson vs Miriam Long / Lindsey Burbridge5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-01-28vs KY/LOU/ACKERMANLost 13
L#1 DoublesBetsy Touma / Amy Dishman vs Maria Shaw / Patricia Hooker2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Kane-Liu vs Rose Shuck6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeigh Cameron / Sarah Johnson vs Tracy Lattis / Kimberly Morton3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesHelen Dashti / Anna Feitelson vs Wendy Knabel / Jessica Hogan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-20vs KY/LOU/THOMPSON/TOMESLost 03
L#1 DoublesHelen Dashti / Shannon Budnick vs Diana Gioia / Morgan Bauer1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Roby / Sarah Kane-Liu vs Caroline Clark / Laurabeth Schmidt1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBetsy Touma / Robin Snook vs Melody Medley / Ann Schmitt3-6, 0-6
2024-01-14vs KY/LOU/AFTENIE/MATANICHLost 04
L#1 DoublesShannon Budnick / Helen Dashti vs Livia Aftenie / Angela Weismiller4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBetsy Touma vs Sarah Keith2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMadge Dennis / Denise Roby vs Karen Raby / Shannon Williams4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Feitelson / Misty Jones vs Miriam Long / Jennifer Goselin1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Helen Dashti
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.92
Sarah Kane-Liu
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 36% · published
3.83
Madge Dennis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.82
Betsy Touma
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.79
Elizabeth Bowling
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.79
Stefanie Nasca
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Amy Dishman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Anna Feitelson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.69
Denise Roby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Angela Beyerle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Robin Snook
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Leigh Cameron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Budnick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefanie Nasca + Helen Dashti10061% games+10.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Bowling + Betsy Touma6266% games+6.8% vs expected
Helen Dashti + Betsy Touma5061% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Bowling + Denise Roby314 matchesnot enough data
Anna Feitelson + Sarah Kane-Liu314 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Kane-Liu + Helen Dashti314 matchesnot enough data
Anna Feitelson + Helen Dashti123 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Kane-Liu + Betsy Touma303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Helen Dashti
59W–17L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.93
Sarah Kane-Liu
86W–46L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.92
Madge Dennis
43W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Betsy Touma
26W–12L career · 10 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Elizabeth Bowling
31W–29L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.79
Stefanie Nasca
24W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Amy Dishman
34W–19L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Anna Feitelson
21W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Denise Roby
29W–32L career · 10 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Angela Beyerle
22W–26L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.45
Robin Snook
14W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.27
Leigh Cameron
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Shannon Budnick
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.