← TeamsLRC-Baird/Gonzalez-Deuce Bags
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men
3 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON
Scouting
Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
3.01
Ken Enslowusually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.79
Steve Hirschusually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published 3
—
John Curryusually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
Results7 ties
2024-11-23Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJohn Curry / Ken Tobias vs David Nemetz / James Schacht6-4, 6-4
2024-11-17Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesKen Enslow / John Curry vs Robert Peters / Randy Holmer5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-02Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKen Enslow / Steve Hirsch vs Michael Boggess / Bill Taylor2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-13Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesCharles Taylor / Ken Enslow vs Randall Uyeno / Brody Kunz6-4, 6-3
2024-10-05Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesCharles Taylor / Steve Hirsch vs Joseph Shorin / Mark Dodson7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGeorge Gonzalez / John Curry vs RJ Widrow / James Phillips7-6, 6-4
2024-09-29Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSteve Hirsch / John Curry vs Doug Hungerford / Todd Fauchald6-1, 6-3
2024-09-21Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesKen Enslow / John Curry vs Bruce Bennett / Marc Medeiros6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete.
Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.
Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.