Teams

IRMSL - Nrs/ Wells

2021 IRMSL Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-04-03vs Buttonwood - CafmeyerWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Strong / Lynn Pittinos vs Nancy Alvarez / Karen Higgins2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-03-27vs Buttonwood - CafmeyerWon 10
W#2 DoublesSue Davis / Carolyn Strong vs Beth Daly / Ruth Ann Nordgren2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-03-20vs Buttonwood - CafmeyerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatricia Brimlow / Rebecca Fulper vs Beth Daly / Beth Grossnickle5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSue Davis / Carolyn Strong vs Ruth Ann Nordgren / Karen Higgins6-0, 6-4
2021-03-13vs Buttonwood - CafmeyerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Strong / Lynn Pittinos vs Elisabeth Smith / Beth Grossnickle4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Dennett / Rebecca Fulper vs Marguerite Madden / Sandra Chapin0-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Carolyn Strong
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Grace Pillari
published 4
3.02
Cynthia Wicker
published 3.5
Lynn Pittinos
published
Mary Murray
published
Patricia Brimlow
published
Rebecca Fulper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sue Davis
published
Susan Dennett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Fulper + Carolyn Strong314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Strong
131W–68L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Grace Pillari
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Cynthia Wicker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
Lynn Pittinos
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Murray
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Brimlow
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rebecca Fulper
61W–61L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sue Davis
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Dennett
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.