Teams

PBTC MCCANN

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-29vs CSRC KLUCKWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharlotte McCormick / Vicki Becker vs Lisa Coyle / Cm Meyers6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristina McCann vs Kendra Crider6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnnette Copeland / Judy Parry vs Marian Phelps / Nancy Brames2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-22vs MEMPK SMITHSplit 11
L#1 DoublesVicki Becker / Mandy Rivera vs Pam Boyd / Kora Gwartney2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCharlotte McCormick / Annette Copeland vs Kendall Lehberger / Katelynn Peterson6-3, 6-2
2025-04-24vs CSRC KLUCKLost 12
L#1 DoublesVicki Becker / Mandy Rivera vs Rebecca Kluck / Marian Phelps5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesChristina McCann vs Kendra Crider6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnnette Copeland / Judy Parry vs Cm Meyers / Lisa Coyle6-7, 1-6
2025-04-17vs MEMPK SMITHLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnnette Copeland / Mandy Rivera vs Kristi Smith / Marti Gilardino6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChristina McCann vs Jasmine Pahk4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharlotte McCormick / Paige Burns vs Pam Boyd / Kora Gwartney0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.31
Paige Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Vicki Becker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Mandy Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Charlotte McCormick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.15
Christina McCann
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.01
Judy Parry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.99
Annette Copeland
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicki Becker + Mandy Rivera4350% games+6.6% vs expected
Vicki Becker + Charlotte McCormick4845% games+3.7% vs expected
Annette Copeland + Paige Burns2544% games−3.7% vs expected
Judy Parry + Annette Copeland3442% games−4.7% vs expected
Judy Parry + Paige Burns1533% games−12.7% vs expected
Judy Parry + Mandy Rivera224 matchesnot enough data
Annette Copeland + Mandy Rivera134 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Rivera + Charlotte McCormick044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Burns
4W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
0%91%9%
2.31
Vicki Becker
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Mandy Rivera
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Charlotte McCormick
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Christina McCann
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Judy Parry
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
2.5
Annette Copeland
9W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.