← Teams

CAC-Leitheiser

2022 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Michael Stone
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Douglas Walker
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Doug Orr
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.09
Steve Thunstedt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Jon Mandeville
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3
Results9 ties
2022-05-25Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesDoug Orr / Bill Sturman vs John Walsh / RICK ROGOWAY7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Stone / Jon Mandeville vs Gary McKenzie / Shirish Patel4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-05-20Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPete Crystal / Douglas Walker vs Philip Flemming / William Reykalin6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDoug Orr / Bill Sturman vs Alan Peters / Mark Rousseve6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDon Dowling / Jon Mandeville vs Bruce Landrey / Fred Leonetti6-0, 6-1
2022-05-13Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesPete Crystal / Douglas Walker vs Robert Shevlin / Scott Mayer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Stone / Bill Sturman vs Keith Jones / Bert Berends7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJon Mandeville / Steve Thunstedt vs Bob Anderson / Harold Clayton6-0, 6-1
2022-05-06Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesPete Crystal / Jon Mandeville vs Craig Frasier / John Hummel6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBill Sturman / Doug Orr vs John Bergin / David Williams6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDon Dowling / Steve Thunstedt vs Paul Koenigsberg / Roland Jarka6-4, 6-1
2022-04-22Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDon Dowling / Steve Thunstedt vs Vilath Oudomphong / Christopher Thomas6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDouglas Walker / Doug Orr vs Edward Vranizan / David Bledsoe6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJon Mandeville / Robert Leitheiser vs Jim Gerber / Mark Rothert6-2, 6-1
2022-04-07Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMichael Stone / Douglas Walker vs Randy Nicholson / Robert Shevlin6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDoug Orr / Robert Leitheiser vs Terry Casebeer / Scott Mayer6-3, 7-5
2022-03-31Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesDouglas Walker / Michael Stone vs Dan Hostetler / Gene Schwartz5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteve Thunstedt / Doug Orr vs Shirish Patel / RICK ROGOWAY6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Leitheiser / Jon Mandeville vs Jim Cullison / Gary Townsend6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMichael Stone / Bob McBride vs Eugene Avery / Vilath Oudomphong3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBill Sturman / Steve Thunstedt vs Terry Chung / Mark Griffin6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDon Dowling / Jon Mandeville vs James Lang / Edward Vranizan2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-03-17Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesSteve Thunstedt / Doug Orr vs Matthew Casimo / Alan Peters7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobert Leitheiser / Jon Mandeville vs William Reykalin / Fred Leonetti6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Michael Stone
26W–44L career
3%96%1%
3.24
3.5
Douglas Walker
74W–82L career
8%92%0%
3.16
3.5
Doug Orr
6W–17L career
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Steve Thunstedt
32W–46L career · type S
25%74%1%
3.09
3
Jon Mandeville
31W–39L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.