Teams

3-KLAAN-Eno-40+ 3.0

2022 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesKatherine Beall vs Rina Lyubkin6-1, 6-2
2022-07-17vs 2-JYoung-Eno-40+ 3.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAlison Neeley vs Hannah Harvey2-6, 4-6
2022-07-14vs 6-CIrish-HRWon 10
W#1 SinglesKristi Laan vs Kim Cabelka7-5, 6-0
2022-06-30vs 1-GLoFrese-Eno-40+ 3.0Won 10
W#2 SinglesKinsey Wennerstrom vs Wendy Lindberg7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-16vs 5-NDolan-EnoWon 21
W#1 SinglesKari Lovetinsky vs Anne Redmond6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKatherine Beall vs Diane Allen6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAlison Neeley vs Tammy Hood5-7, 5-7
2022-06-09vs 4-MLong-Eno-40+ 3.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesKristi Laan vs Tammy Chin6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKinsey Wennerstrom vs Caryl Schwartzbach6-2, 6-1
2022-06-02vs 8-KMoore-HVCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesAlison Neeley vs Amy Herman0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesKari Lovetinsky vs Hadley Nixon4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Kristi Laan
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Kinsey Wennerstrom
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
3.00
Abigail Weaver
published 3
2.93
Katherine Beall
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.81
Kari Lovetinsky
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.66
Maureen Green
published
2.56
Alison Neeley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kari Lovetinsky + Kristi Laan4548% gamesnot enough data
Alison Neeley + Kristi Laan6061% gamesnot enough data
Kari Lovetinsky + Alison Neeley134 matchesnot enough data
Alison Neeley + Kinsey Wennerstrom134 matchesnot enough data
Kristi Laan + Abigail Weaver123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristi Laan
262W–182L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3
Kinsey Wennerstrom
127W–103L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Abigail Weaver
18W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.00
3
Katherine Beall
50W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Kari Lovetinsky
116W–121L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Maureen Green
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Alison Neeley
44W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.