Teams

LCTA18/Huennekens/CTC

Other 18 & Over Singles League · Women 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-11vs LCTA18/Stinson/Hanahan Hawks NestLost 12
W#1 SinglesHampton Williams vs Sharlene Douthit6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKaitlyn Norton vs Jasmine Pan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesIsabella Sparhawk vs Gina Cox2-6, 3-6
2026-06-20vs LCTA18/Sweet/CTCWon 21
W#1 SinglesRachael Sims vs Meghan Casey6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKate Vincze vs Melanie Grochowski6-0, 6-4
L#3 SinglesKristi Mcintyre vs Julie Smith6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2026-06-17vs LCTA18/Cherin/DICWon 30
W#1 SinglesKendall Huennekens vs Alexandra Cherin6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRachael Sims vs Lauren Vriesinga6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMaren Moore vs Meredith Jewell6-0, 6-1
2026-05-30vs LCTA18/Stinson/Hanahan Hawks NestWon 21
L#1 SinglesHampton Williams vs Caroline Stinson1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesChelsea Heidt vs Courtney Carter7-5, 6-4
W#3 SinglesMaren Moore vs Olivia Kiss7-5, 6-0
2026-05-09vs LCTA18/Sweet/CTCWon 21
W#1 SinglesHannah Schrader vs Emily Guth6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKendall Huennekens vs Caroline Kail2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesIsabella Sparhawk vs Katie Beaudette6-3, 7-6
2026-05-06vs LCTA18/Cherin/DICWon 21
W#1 SinglesHampton Williams vs Alexandra Cherin6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRachael Sims vs Lauren Vriesinga7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesKendall Huennekens vs Meredith Jewell6-0, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-26vs LCTA18/Carr/DotyWon 20
W#1 SinglesHampton Williams vs Pamela W Carr6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesChelsea Heidt vs Catherine Tekac6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA18/Huennekens/CTC7118616153
2LCTA18/Stinson/Hanahan Hawks Nest5316821171
3LCTA18/Sweet/CTC5315921176
4LCTA18/Cherin/DIC35111328189
5LCTA18/Carr/Doty0802448283

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Kate Vincze
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.64
Kristi Mcintyre
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.49
Hampton Williams
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.41
Rachael Sims
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.41
Maren Moore
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.27
Chelsea Heidt
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Kendall Huennekens
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Isabella Sparhawk
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Hannah Schrader
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.10
Kaitlyn Norton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Vincze + Kristi Mcintyre404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Vincze
13W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%2%98%
2.78
Kristi Mcintyre
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%14%86%
2.64
2.5
Hampton Williams
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
Rachael Sims
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
Maren Moore
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.41
2.5
Chelsea Heidt
5W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
Kendall Huennekens
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Isabella Sparhawk
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Hannah Schrader
4W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Kaitlyn Norton
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.