Teams

Raintree Enters

2023 Richmond Flexible Format Women · Richmond Flexible Format Women 7.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-22vs Westwood SeredniLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesLaura Ransone / Amy Boschen vs Liza Hause / Christine Albrecht3-6, 3-6
2023-05-15vs RMC SweeneyLost 02
L#2 Female DoublesEliza Causey / Laura Ransone vs Kathy Flowers / Cynthia Muncy0-6, 2-6
L#3 Female DoublesAmy Boschen / Katheryn Enters vs Kim Johnson / Lynne Moore3-6, 0-6
2023-05-08vs Woodlake HannonWon 20
W#2 Female DoublesSuzanne Spadafora / Eliza Causey vs Jennifer Harris / Crissy Poindexter6-4, 6-1
W#3 Female DoublesChristine Martine / Laura Ransone vs Jeanean Phelps / Rosie Ortiz6-4, 6-0
2023-05-01vs Bon Air RhodesLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesSuzanne Spadafora / Katheryn Enters vs Michelle Jepson / Rebecca Madison6-7, 2-6
L#3 Female DoublesLaura Ransone / Amy Boschen vs Janet Miller / Pamela Blackburn6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-04-24vs HCC Lines 7.0Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesSuzanne Spadafora / Amy Boschen vs Joanna Bergeron / Sharon Mugford6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-17vs CCV BealeWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesSuzanne Spadafora / Amy Scherer vs Kirsti Goodwin / Ashley Millen6-3, 6-4
W#3 Female DoublesAmy Boschen / Christine Martine vs MaryLee Baker / Windy Campbell6-4, 6-1
2023-04-10vs MAC MortonLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesSuzanne Spadafora / Katheryn Enters vs Kaitlyn Mejia / Deirdre Vaughan6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 Female DoublesChristine Martine / Amy Boschen vs Melody Morton / Susan Staton6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Flexible Format Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Suzanne Spadafora
usually #1 Female Doubles 80%, also #2 Female Doubles 20% · published
3.57
Laura Ransone
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Amy Scherer
published 3.5
3.00
Christine Martine
published 3.5
2.90
Katheryn Enters
published
2.87
Amy Boschen
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 17% · published 3
2.87
Eliza Causey
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Spadafora + Amy Boschen213 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Spadafora + Laura Ransone123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Spadafora
63W–89L career · 5 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Laura Ransone
82W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.57
3.5
Amy Scherer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Christine Martine
4W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
Katheryn Enters
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Amy Boschen
154W–164L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Eliza Causey
22W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.