Teams

Walnut Creek TC CM8.5A

2023 COMBO · Men 8.5

22 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-10-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesFrancisco MacIas / Alan Chan vs Herman Austero / Hermski Austero3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-09-03vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS CM8.5BLost 01
L#2 DoublesManish Singh / Alan Chan vs Frederick Crescencio / Edgar Crescencio3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Francisco MacIas
published
4.28
Matt Lourens
published
4.25
Debashis Panda
published 4.5
4.18
Leonardo Kim
published
4.12
Michael Attiyeh
published
4.07
Nicholas Greenwald
published
3.99
Sanjay Backliwal
published
3.94
Jonathan Maze
published
3.93
Dan Gullion
published 4
3.91
Jeffrey Magidson
published
3.90
Thomas Lyhne
published
3.83
Stephen Buchholz
published
3.79
Kamal Mistry
published
3.75
Mark Chase
published
3.73
Paul Morrow
published
3.72
Garvin Tom
published
3.71
Manish Singh
published
3.66
Paul Lizama
published
3.63
Lloyd Hohenstein
published
3.62
Ritesh Bhandari
published
3.44
Alan Chan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.36
Jeb Horton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Buchholz + Garvin Tom8259% games+8.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Francisco MacIas
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.28
Matt Lourens
35W–24L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Debashis Panda
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
4.25
Leonardo Kim
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
4.18
Michael Attiyeh
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.12
Nicholas Greenwald
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
4.07
Sanjay Backliwal
12W–32L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.99
Jonathan Maze
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.94
4
Dan Gullion
37W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
Jeffrey Magidson
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.91
Thomas Lyhne
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.90
Stephen Buchholz
26W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Kamal Mistry
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
Mark Chase
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.75
Paul Morrow
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Garvin Tom
23W–11L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Manish Singh
17W–15L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Paul Lizama
3W–15L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
Lloyd Hohenstein
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Ritesh Bhandari
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%20%80%
3.62
4
Alan Chan
80W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.44
Jeb Horton
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.