Teams

HOCO-GRANSTAFF

2024 · 2025 MATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter Thursday Nights

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-01-19vs JDS-PARROTWon 10
W#1 DoublesNick Buccelli / Stephanie Carlson vs Margaret Mims / Bill Waldrep7-5, 6-1
2025-01-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesNick Buccelli / Jenny Jackson vs Damien Parrott / Tashelga Parrott6-3, 6-1
2025-01-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesNick Buccelli / Stephanie Carlson vs Elizabeth Herndon / Eddie Skoda6-0, 6-4
2024-12-15Won 20
W#1 DoublesLamario Harris / Emma Warren vs Ellen Duggan / Reuben Ellis6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNick Buccelli / Stephanie Carlson vs Barbara Flanagan / Joel Ginaldi7-5, 6-4
2024-11-24Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmanda Woods / Lamario Harris vs Shauna Dixon / Reuben Ellis6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Carlson / Nick Buccelli vs Elizabeth Herndon / Eddie Skoda3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 MATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter Thursday Nights have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Lamario Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Kiara Laurent
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Christopher Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.15
Brooks Fox
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Stephanie Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Amanda Woods
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Emma Warren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Philip West
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Laura Armenta
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Brooklyn Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jenny Jackson
published
Nick Buccelli
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Steve Ingeman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Carlson + Nick Buccelli5352% gamesnot enough data
Kiara Laurent + Christopher Ryan5070% gamesnot enough data
Emma Warren + Kiara Laurent213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lamario Harris
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Kiara Laurent
50W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3
Christopher Ryan
21W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
3.5
Brooks Fox
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Stephanie Carlson
22W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
3.5
Amanda Woods
15W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Emma Warren
23W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Philip West
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Laura Armenta
22W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Brooklyn Jackson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Jackson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Buccelli
7W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Ingeman
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.