Teams

Buckhorn The Average Joes/Setizinger

2026 Hillsborough Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Combo 18 & Over Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-15vs Hunters Green Fees/WarrenWon 20
W#1 DoublesCARLOS Ramirez / Shawn Rasmussen vs Patrick Rairigh / Mark Weissman6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKiran Dwarakanath Mane / Maurice Steenland vs David Mardo / Les Lettiero4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-08vs Hunters Green Fees/WarrenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDaniel Espinoza / Bill Almond vs David Mardo / Les Lettiero4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesOmar Cantu / Shawn Rasmussen vs Timothy Carr / Diego Perez6-4, 6-2
2026-08-04vs Hunters Green Fees/WarrenWon 21
L#1 DoublesOmar Cantu / Brandon Mccaffery vs John Cotey / Randall Smith6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJason Lee / Shawn Rasmussen vs Jonathon Cotey / Robert Philbin7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesArun Lamba / Daniel Espinoza vs Philip Kalafut / Dwight Ford6-4, 6-4
2026-08-01vs Hunters Green Fees/WarrenLost 12
W#1 DoublesOmar Cantu / Daniel Espinoza vs Matthew Warren / Dwight Ford3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFelipe Guacache / Maurice Steenland vs John Cotey / Robert Philbin1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKiran Dwarakanath Mane / Shawn Rasmussen vs Jonathon Cotey / Mark Weissman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-25vs Hunters Green Fees/WarrenLost 12
L#1 DoublesCARLOS Ramirez / Jordan Murray vs Sean Friday / Robert Philbin2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesOmar Cantu / Daniel Espinoza vs Philip Kalafut / Dwight Ford6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJavid Lateef / Maurice Steenland vs Jim Johnson / Mark Weissman2-6, 2-6
2026-07-11vs Hunters Green Fees/WarrenLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Chee-A-Tow / Maurice Steenland vs Sean Friday / Diego Perez1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesOmar Cantu / Shawn Rasmussen vs Patrick Rairigh / Mark Weissman7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesScott Tashman / Jordan Murray vs Gregg Sturdevant / Jonathon Cotey3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-27vs Hunters Green Fees/WarrenLost 12
W#1 DoublesCARLOS Ramirez / David Dikmen vs Christopher Baker / Randall Smith7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJon Brown / Maurice Steenland vs Jim Johnson / Diego Perez6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesOmar Cantu / Brandon Mccaffery vs Matthew Warren / Robert Philbin3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.5 Combo 18 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hunters Green Fees/Warren5213821175
2Buckhorn The Average Joes/Setizinger2581328203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Jon Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Felipe Guacache
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Chris Chee-A-Tow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Arun Lamba
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Javid Lateef
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
CARLOS Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.26
Scott Tashman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Omar Cantu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Kiran Dwarakanath Mane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Daniel Espinoza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.06
David Dikmen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Maurice Steenland
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.91
Shawn Rasmussen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.73
Jordan Murray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Bill Almond
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jordan Murray + Bill Almond134 matchesnot enough data
Omar Cantu + Daniel Espinoza213 matchesnot enough data
Shawn Rasmussen + Daniel Espinoza123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jon Brown
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Felipe Guacache
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Chris Chee-A-Tow
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Arun Lamba
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Javid Lateef
38W–122L career · 3 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.37
3.5
CARLOS Ramirez
11W–14L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Scott Tashman
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Omar Cantu
5W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Kiran Dwarakanath Mane
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Daniel Espinoza
11W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
David Dikmen
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Maurice Steenland
6W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Shawn Rasmussen
15W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Jordan Murray
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Bill Almond
2W–9L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.