Teams

Odell - Ramey

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall '24 · Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-08vs Odell - TimmermanWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Fralick / Michele Flanders vs Elizabeth Bushnell / Kristen Elmshaeuser6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebra Lindburg / Laurel Landon vs Sharon DeHart / Melissa Bunney6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaurel Landon / Debra Lindburg vs Lorraine Gardner / Laurie Chase6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDiane Harrison / Dana Davis vs Deb Royer / Laurie Chase6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLaurel Landon / Tracie Kramer vs Sharon Klein / Jane Hemingway6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-23vs Odell - TimmermanLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Harrison / Lisa Rowland vs Ann Fago / Susan Watson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaurel Landon / Dana Davis vs Beth Weik / Victoria Colon2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMichele Flanders / Karen Fralick vs Meghan Timmerman / Kristen Elmshaeuser6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesMichele Flanders / Karen Fralick vs Deb Royer / Jane Hemingway6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDana Davis / Carlene Clark vs Patty Herring / Molly Hunt7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiane Harrison / Lisa Rowland vs Laurie Chase / Jeanne Warczyglowa6-0, 6-1
2024-10-27vs Odell - TimmermanWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebra Lindburg / Laurel Landon vs Laura Hall / Ann Fago6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarlene Clark / Dana Davis vs Susan Watson / Beth Weik6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLisa Rowland / Diane Harrison vs Mary Fuchs / Victoria Colon6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Carlene Clark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Diane Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Laurel Landon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.36
Debra Lindburg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Karen Fralick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Tracie Kramer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Lisa Rowland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Michele Flanders
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Staten
published
Stephanie Ramey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Harrison + Lisa Rowland3259% games+15.2% vs expected
Laurel Landon + Debra Lindburg3261% games+5.8% vs expected
Diane Harrison + Tracie Kramer16658% games+4.3% vs expected
Debra Lindburg + Carlene Clark5258% games+1.3% vs expected
Karen Fralick + Michele Flanders24956% games−0.4% vs expected
Carlene Clark + Diane Harrison10462% games−1.9% vs expected
Carlene Clark + Lisa Rowland3354% gamesnot enough data
Carlene Clark + Michele Flanders314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carlene Clark
64W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Diane Harrison
167W–117L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Laurel Landon
71W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Debra Lindburg
19W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.36
Karen Fralick
57W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
Tracie Kramer
29W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Lisa Rowland
34W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Michele Flanders
42W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.14
Karen Staten
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Ramey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.