Teams

GEPTA/40&over/3.5W/Follin/Lion

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesJanet Treon / Gail Richardson vs Kristine Garcia / Laura Houston6-1, 6-2
2026-03-01Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJanet Santackas / Jacqueline Porter vs Jennifer Viramontes / Damaris Desbois4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJamie Borsodi / Gail Richardson vs Michelle Smith / Adriana Acosta4-6, 1-6
2026-02-22Won 20
W#1 SinglesHelena Loest vs Marykathleen Towle7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Porter / Janet Santackas vs Hilda Finn / Harri Baumann6-4, 7-6
2026-02-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesHelena Loest vs Ivette Acosta3-6, 5-4
2026-02-08Split 11
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Porter / Janet Santackas vs Guadalupe Castillo / Sarahi Najera7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJamie Borsodi / Gail Richardson vs Ellen Michnovicz / Sandra Torres6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-31Won 10
W#1 SinglesHelena Loest vs Irma Portillo6-1, 6-2
2026-01-18Split 11
L#1 DoublesJanet Treon / Gail Richardson vs Elena Sandoval / Isela Rayon2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Porter / Janet Santackas vs Yuri Caire / Claire Brandon6-4, 6-4
2026-01-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Kinkel / Gail Richardson vs Anna Camille Kerr / Laura Leslie6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Chantal Spilliaert
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.25
Cynthia Pelak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Candace Giummo
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published 3.5
3.15
Debbie Kinkel
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published 3.5
Gail Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Helena Loest
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jacqueline Porter
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Jamie Borsodi
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Janet Santackas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Treon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kathleen O'Bryan
published
Kerry Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Lori McGuire
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Maggie Follin
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Martha Trost
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candace Giummo + Chantal Spilliaert2739% games−1.1% vs expected
Maggie Follin + Chantal Spilliaert6751% gamesnot enough data
Candace Giummo + Cynthia Pelak8455% gamesnot enough data
Janet Santackas + Jacqueline Porter7551% gamesnot enough data
Lori McGuire + Kerry Gallagher3742% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Follin + Jacqueline Porter5257% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Follin + Martha Trost4349% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Kinkel + Martha Trost5253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chantal Spilliaert
24W–27L career · 18 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Cynthia Pelak
15W–11L career · 12 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Candace Giummo
14W–31L career · 19 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Debbie Kinkel
19W–30L career · type A · 19 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Gail Richardson
31W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Helena Loest
19W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jacqueline Porter
35W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jamie Borsodi
22W–37L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Janet Santackas
32W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Janet Treon
33W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathleen O'Bryan
28W–28L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kerry Gallagher
16W–27L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori McGuire
36W–85L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maggie Follin
42W–32L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Martha Trost
19W–31L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.