Teams

DTC PURPLE

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

17 players · average NTRP 3.56 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs CACM BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesLiz Donahue / Ethel McGlynn vs Bev Morrow / Karla Simons4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCaroline Blakney vs Regina Fontaine2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Hart / Danielle Remington vs Caren Misky / Maricris Doolan6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErica Bissette / Sheila Tsai vs Paula Broe / Juli Bulloch6-0, 6-4
2024-05-23vs CM BLUEWon 30
W#2 DoublesLiz Donahue / Ethel McGlynn vs Katie Comisky / Mary Vivo6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCaroline Blakney vs Michelle Eidson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Snyder / Sheila Tsai vs Cindy Sawyer / Margaret Deline6-0, 6-3
2024-05-16vs GTC REDWon 21
W#2 DoublesKristin Bokelman / Sarah Hart vs Maeve Cohen / Marlie Nelson6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCaroline Blakney vs Adele Norton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMigdalia Morillo Rettig / Sheila Tsai vs Molly Burke / Allison Abrams3-6, 3-6
2024-05-09vs SKY ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Rogers / Liz Donahue vs Heather Johnson / Leslie Rich6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristin Bokelman / Danielle Remington vs Lucy Downey / Carrie Denham6-3, 6-3
2024-05-02vs CP GOLDSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDanielle Remington / Julie Snyder vs Laura Maugel / Alicia Jiron6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSheila Tsai / Migdalia Morillo Rettig vs Katy Plath / Lena Ursten Hobbs6-7, 4-6
2024-04-25vs WP GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Montgomery / Kristin Bokelman vs Rebecca Gart / Deborah Alper6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Garg / Sarah Hart vs Kimberly Allen / Sanda McMillan6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSheila Tsai / Caroline Blakney vs Nicole Parker / Sue Hickey1-6, 4-6
2024-04-18vs DCC GREENWon 20
W#2 DoublesLiz Donahue / Julie Snyder vs Jennifer Connelly / Dory Pratt6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDanielle Remington / Molly Garg vs Robyn Larkin / Megan Harry6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Danielle Remington
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.42
Erica Bissette
published
3.37
Ethel McGlynn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Kimberly Montgomery
published
3.31
Liz Donahue
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Molly Garg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Kristin Bokelman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Lindsay Freeman
published
3.27
Julie Snyder
published
3.26
Sarah Killeen
published
3.26
Cristin Bracken
published 3.5
3.20
Caroline Blakney
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Sarah Hart
published
3.11
Sheila Tsai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Laura Rogers
published
Karen Polzin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Bissette + Julie Snyder5070% games+11.8% vs expected
Molly Garg + Danielle Remington591364% games+7.3% vs expected
Kristin Bokelman + Kimberly Montgomery9359% games+5.5% vs expected
Sarah Hart + Kimberly Montgomery3651% games−2.3% vs expected
Liz Donahue + Ethel McGlynn221955% games−3.3% vs expected
Laura Rogers + Kimberly Montgomery1447% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Bokelman + Sarah Hart314 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Tsai + Danielle Remington404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danielle Remington
109W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
Erica Bissette
33W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Ethel McGlynn
45W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kimberly Montgomery
21W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Liz Donahue
45W–41L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Molly Garg
93W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Kristin Bokelman
87W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Lindsay Freeman
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Julie Snyder
24W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Sarah Killeen
19W–16L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Migdalia Morillo Rettig
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Cristin Bracken
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Caroline Blakney
17W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Sarah Hart
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Sheila Tsai
138W–87L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Laura Rogers
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Karen Polzin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.