Teams

CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 M, Davis (WIRC)

Fall CIN Adult 40 & Over · CIN Indy 40 & Over 4.0 Men, F

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesBen Harris / Tyson Smith vs Dennis Wood / Joseph Miles1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJason Fordham vs James Frohardt3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJonathan Scott / David Wright vs Daniel Nelson / Joe Bauer1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesCarlos Spencer / David Wright vs Daniel Segal / Jeff Dettelbach6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJason Fordham vs Lee Phillips1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEric Steele / Benjamin Housh vs Ahmed Haider / Sean Keller2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDouglas Gernert / Gary Russell vs Kerry Beidelman / Justin Nevitt1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJason Fordham vs Brant Suhrie7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Housh / Eric Steele vs David Fritts / Terry Warrum6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Housh / Carlos Spencer vs Rolf Kreutz / David Webber2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDouglas Gernert / Jim Mc Millan vs Dennis Boom / Bruce Benjamin1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesDouglas Gernert / Eric Steele vs Chris Cooke / Nicholas Winings1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJason Fordham vs John Deignan1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRoger Davis / Tyson Smith vs Joseph Miles / Daniel Nelson1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJim Mc Millan / David Wright vs Brian Upchurch / TIMOTHY COYNE2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJonathan Scott / Carlos Spencer vs David Kupinski / Sean Leonard4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJonathan Scott / Eric Steele vs Brian Killeen / Lee Phillips2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJason Fordham vs Ryan Fischer2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarlos Spencer / Benjamin Housh vs Ahmed Haider / Josh Husmann1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJim Mc Millan / Gary Russell vs Paul Lee / Yang Xiao2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBen Harris / Tyson Smith vs HAI GENG / Kurt Ackerman1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesTyson Smith / David Wright vs Scott Paramoure / Steve Schneider4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Housh vs Bradley Love3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · CIN Indy 40 & Over 4.0 Men, F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 M, Gupta (IRC-D)7118615191
2CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 M, Shippy (JCC)72171026240
3CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 M, Tammen (IRC-E)53141024204
4CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 M, Benjamin (CRC)44131123212
5CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 M, Nelson (CRC)45151226215
6CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 M, Verde (IRC-D)2781942294
7CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 M, Davis (WIRC)1852247300

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Eric Steele
published 4
3.65
Jason Fordham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.53
Benjamin Housh
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.52
Carlos Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Douglas Gernert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Tyson Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ben Harris
published 3.5
Gary Russell
published 3.5
Jim Mc Millan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jonathan Scott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyson Smith + Jim Mc Millan6257% gamesnot enough data
Eric Steele + Jonathan Scott1542% gamesnot enough data
Eric Steele + Benjamin Housh1541% gamesnot enough data
Jason Fordham + Carlos Spencer0544% gamesnot enough data
Eric Steele + Carlos Spencer314 matchesnot enough data
Jason Fordham + Tyson Smith224 matchesnot enough data
Ben Harris + Carlos Spencer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Steele
8W–26L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jason Fordham
92W–94L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Benjamin Housh
4W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Carlos Spencer
23W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Douglas Gernert
12W–33L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Tyson Smith
55W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Ben Harris
18W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Gary Russell
25W–26L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jim Mc Millan
17W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jonathan Scott
4W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.