Teams

Brett/Wilkinson

2023 Columbia Adult 18 & Over League · 3.5 Adult Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-26vs Bohl - ColumbiaWon 32
W#1 DoublesErica Beshore / Oksana Cottone vs Lea Brandt / Regan Ubinas6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGina Whorley vs Vitalija Bechtold2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHelen Anderson / Kathy Hodges vs Carolyn Spencer / Julia Norregaard7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKatie Wilkinson vs Lauren Crosby1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHannah Holzum / Elizabeth Malm-Buatsi vs Reagan Brown / KEIRA HAMANN6-4, 6-4
2023-06-16vs Bohl - ColumbiaLost 14
L#1 DoublesJESSICA Wade / Julie Klein vs Sarah Bohl / Lauren Crosby1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesGina Whorley vs Carolyn Spencer6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLeah Sirois / Helen Anderson vs Julia Norregaard / Alicia Casady4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Malm-Buatsi vs KEIRA HAMANN1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAllie Brett / Hannah Holzum vs Sarah Paetzold / Elizabeth Ball6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-06-12vs Bohl - ColumbiaLost 23
L#1 DoublesKathy Hodges / JESSICA Wade vs Lea Brandt / Vitalija Bechtold3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesOksana Cottone vs Elizabeth Ball6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAllie Brett / Amy Susan vs Julia Norregaard / NICOLE Reynolds6-7, 6-7
W#2 SinglesKatie Wilkinson vs Reagan Brown6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesHannah Holzum / Stessie Millner vs KEIRA HAMANN / Sarah Paetzold2-6, 1-6
2023-06-05vs Bohl - ColumbiaSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKathy Hodges / Leah Sirois vs Sarah Bohl / Lea Brandt7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesErica Beshore vs Alicia Casady6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatie Wilkinson / Julie Klein vs Elizabeth Ball / Lauren Crosby2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesGina Whorley vs Sarah Paetzold6-4, 6-4
2023-06-01vs Bohl - ColumbiaLost 04
L#1 DoublesErica Beshore / Kathy Hodges vs Sarah Bohl / Lauren Crosby2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGina Whorley vs Lea Brandt0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Malm-Buatsi / Amy Susan vs Julia Norregaard / Elizabeth Ball2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHannah Holzum / Stessie Millner vs KEIRA HAMANN / Alicia Casady2-6, 4-6
2023-05-22vs Bohl - ColumbiaLost 14
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Malm-Buatsi / Julie Klein vs Vitalija Bechtold / Lea Brandt0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesGina Whorley vs Elizabeth Ball6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAllie Brett / Leah Sirois vs Lauren Crosby / Sarah Bohl1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKatie Wilkinson vs Carolyn Spencer1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Susan / Hannah Holzum vs Reagan Brown / Sarah Paetzold7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bohl - Columbia51201024230
2Brett/Wilkinson15102042304

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Oksana Cottone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.54
Stephanie Womack
published
3.35
Erica Beshore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.91
Kathy Hodges
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Amy Susan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Allie Brett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Elizabeth Malm-Buatsi
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Gina Whorley
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Hannah Holzum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Helen Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
JESSICA Wade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Wilkinson
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Leah Sirois
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Toni Doster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Womack + Toni Doster213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Oksana Cottone
57W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.63
Stephanie Womack
21W–35L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.54
Erica Beshore
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Kathy Hodges
20W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.91
3.5
Amy Susan
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.84
3
Allie Brett
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Elizabeth Malm-Buatsi
3W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
2.71
Gina Whorley
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Hannah Holzum
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Helen Anderson
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
JESSICA Wade
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Katie Wilkinson
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Leah Sirois
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Toni Doster
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.