Teams

NAZ/Harbeck/40&over/3.5M/7589862714

2024 Adult 40 & Over - NAZ · NAZ 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-05vs MillerWon 40
W#1 DoublesDavid Logan / Bill Bartling vs Derek Miller / Michael Chan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Jonovich vs Robin Bryer6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesArthur Moorhead / Larry Plaster vs Bob Guzley / Todd Gillenwater7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHugh Salisbury / Mark Kaiser vs Anthony Medina / Don Ziebell6-4, 6-3
2023-11-05vs MillerWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Logan / Bill Bartling vs Derek Miller / Bob Guzley7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMark Kaiser / Hugh Salisbury vs Michael Chan / Don Ziebell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Jonovich / Larry Plaster vs Anthony Medina / Todd Gillenwater7-5, 6-3
2023-10-01vs MillerWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott van Vleet / David Logan vs Derek Miller / Todd Gillenwater6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMike Denny / Josh Walker vs Don Ziebell / Bob Guzley7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesArthur Moorhead / Bill Bartling vs Craig Bearchell / Anthony Medina6-1, 6-4
2023-10-01vs MillerWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Harbeck / Josh Walker vs Derek Miller / Bob Guzley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRonald Strong / John Jonovich vs Todd Gillenwater / Don Ziebell6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMark Kaiser / Larry Plaster vs Craig Bearchell / Anthony Medina6-4, 6-1
2023-09-24vs MillerLost 12
L#1 DoublesScott van Vleet / John Jonovich vs Derek Miller / Bob Guzley3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesArthur Moorhead / Hugh Salisbury vs Ron Gray / Robin Bryer4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Harbeck / Mike Denny vs Craig Bearchell / Bruce Schielke6-2, 6-1
2023-09-24vs MillerWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid Logan / Scott van Vleet vs Bob Guzley / Don Ziebell6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMike Denny vs Todd Gillenwater6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesArthur Moorhead / John Jonovich vs Derek Miller / Bruce Schielke7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMark Kaiser / Hugh Salisbury vs Ron Gray / Robin Bryer4-6, 3-6
2023-09-10vs MillerWon 40
W#1 DoublesBill Bartling / David Logan vs Bob Guzley / Michael Chan6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesBrian Harbeck vs Matt Holt6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Jonovich / Arthur Moorhead vs Derek Miller / Bob Boyer6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRonald Strong / Mark Kaiser vs Anthony Medina / Bruce Schielke6-0, 6-0
2023-09-10vs MillerWon 31
L#1 DoublesJohn Jonovich / David Logan vs Derek Miller / Michael Chan3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJosh Walker vs Gary Vallen6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Harbeck / Arthur Moorhead vs Bob Guzley / Anthony Medina6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBill Bartling / Mark Kaiser vs Bruce Schielke / Bob Boyer6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · NAZ 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NAZ/Harbeck/40&over/3.5M/75898627148028411210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Zachary Hackerott
published
3.44
Scott van Vleet
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
David Logan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Arthur Moorhead
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Bill Bartling
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.00
Brian Harbeck
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.00
Mark Kaiser
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Hugh Salisbury
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
John Jonovich
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Josh Walker
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Larry Plaster
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mike Denny
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Kaiser + Hugh Salisbury3350% gamesnot enough data
Bill Bartling + David Logan314 matchesnot enough data
Scott van Vleet + David Logan404 matchesnot enough data
John Jonovich + Arthur Moorhead303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Hackerott
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.94
Scott van Vleet
98W–100L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
David Logan
23W–4L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Arthur Moorhead
9W–2L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Bill Bartling
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brian Harbeck
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Mark Kaiser
9W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
Hugh Salisbury
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Jonovich
7W–4L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Josh Walker
13W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Larry Plaster
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Denny
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.