Teams

PENINSULA GCC 18MX9.0A

2024 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX9.0

20 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-02-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Bressie / Sheila Cooper vs Christy Ma / David Frederick2-6, 2-6
2024-01-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSheila Cooper / Young Chung vs Liang Song / Kelly Kennedy2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Anthony Kerin
published 5
4.43
Shiraz Madan
published
4.39
Mark Strem
published
4.35
David Bressie
published 4.5
4.04
Ric Fenton
published
4.01
Christopher Wu
published 4
4.00
Jonathan Tang
published
3.95
Meaghan Schaefer
published
3.82
Jennifer Maravillas
published
Amy Fenton
published 4
Danielle Kling
published 4
3.70
Sheila Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Mindy Wong
published
3.67
Erica Reilly
published
3.39
Patricia Royse
published
3.33
May Mu
published
Jennifer Bugna
published
Lexi Slavet
published
Megan Strickland
published
Palmer Mendelson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Anthony Kerin
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.93
Shiraz Madan
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
4.43
Mark Strem
19W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
David Bressie
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
4.35
Ric Fenton
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
4.04
4
Christopher Wu
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
4.01
Jonathan Tang
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
Meaghan Schaefer
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.95
Jennifer Maravillas
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
3.82
4
Amy Fenton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Danielle Kling
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sheila Cooper
42W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Mindy Wong
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Erica Reilly
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Patricia Royse
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.39
May Mu
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33
Jennifer Bugna
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lexi Slavet
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Strickland
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Palmer Mendelson
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.