Teams

Bi.Green18T

2023 Cap Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-13vs Co.Sutler18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesScott Hoffman / Ben Micham vs Cody Sutler / Tyler Priest4-6, 2-6
2023-07-06vs Ch.Lav18TLost 02
L#2 DoublesBen Micham / Scott Hoffman vs Chun Lav / Philip Gugliotta1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRick Lowe / Ryan Busey vs James Coblentz / Brooks Lowe4-6, 3-6
2023-06-29vs De.Meares18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Gentry / Rick Lowe vs Jason DeGroff / Gregory Knowles2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-24vs Ra.Xu18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Kelly / Ben Micham vs Noah Yao / Reece Desonglo1-6, 1-6
2023-06-15vs Ch.Wright18TWon 10
W#2 DoublesBen Micham / Ryan Busey vs Harrison Fell / Rodney Lohman6-2, 6-2
2023-06-08vs Sc.StJohn18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesBill Green / Brian Kaulback vs Sterling Thomas / Daniel Shields2-6, 1-6
2023-06-01vs Jo.Markham18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Boyce / Scott Hoffman vs Penn Holderness / Bryan Barker5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Busey / Rick Lowe vs John Vander Vennet / Willi Hayes4-6, 3-6
2023-05-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesRyan Busey / Rick Lowe vs Ben Williams / John Stephens6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Ryan Busey
published
3.44
Scott Hoffman
published
3.38
David Boyce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.29
Bill Green
published 3.5
3.14
Mark Zimmerman
published
3.13
Brian Kaulback
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Rick Lowe
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Ben Micham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Dan Schaefer
published 3.5
2.83
Mark Gentry
published
2.70
Eddie King
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Kaulback + Rick Lowe134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Zimmerman + Bill Green303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Busey
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Scott Hoffman
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
3.44
4
David Boyce
24W–65L career · 1 line in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Bill Green
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Mark Zimmerman
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Brian Kaulback
51W–67L career · 1 line in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Rick Lowe
50W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Ben Micham
70W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Dan Schaefer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
Mark Gentry
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Eddie King
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.