Teams

VCT/Gold

2025 IRMSL Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

21 players · average NTRP 3.31 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-15vs IRMSL/BorchersLost 01
L#2 DoublesStacey Barnett / Jessica Vega Coots vs Lindsay Morales / Karianne Lange1-6, 2-6
2025-10-25vs IRMSL/BorchersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJessica Vega Coots / Molly Teter vs Darla Cederberg / Brooke Brooks6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEliot Foote / Stacey Barnett vs Lindsay Morales / Karianne Lange2-6, 0-6
2025-10-11vs IRMSL/BorchersWon 20
W#2 DoublesKatie Hutton / Jessica Vega Coots vs Christie Mayer / Tomorra Smith6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEliot Foote / Stacey Barnett vs Livia K DeBonet / Jacqui O'Bree6-3, 6-4
2025-10-04vs IRMSL/BorchersLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatie Hutton / Jessica Vega Coots vs Tillie Borchers / Jessica Tornese3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jessica Vega Coots
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.56
Patricia Essick
published
3.50
Julia Durham
published
3.44
Eliot Foote
published
3.38
Andrea Geldres
published 3.5
3.29
Susan Hofstetter
published
3.28
Amy Vanharpen
published 3.5
3.17
Kristin Hazelton
published
3.16
Christine Kahler
published 3.5
3.11
Pia Gold
published
3.09
Katie Hutton
published
3.08
Jennifer Cancio
published
3.02
Jennifer Craig
published
2.99
Diana Tremesani
published 3
2.92
Beth Kalish
published 3
2.88
Joan Dobravsky
published
2.87
Diane Mello
published 3.5
2.78
Rebecca Emmons
published 3
2.58
Stacey Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kimberle Beckett
published
Kristin Notte
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Cancio + Jennifer Craig404 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Hazelton + Andrea Geldres303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jessica Vega Coots
90W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.75
Patricia Essick
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.56
Julia Durham
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Eliot Foote
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
3.5
Andrea Geldres
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Susan Hofstetter
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Amy Vanharpen
36W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Kristin Hazelton
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Christine Kahler
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Pia Gold
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
Katie Hutton
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Jennifer Cancio
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Jennifer Craig
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Diana Tremesani
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Beth Kalish
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.92
Joan Dobravsky
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88
3.5
Diane Mello
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
3
Rebecca Emmons
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Stacey Barnett
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.58
Kimberle Beckett
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Notte
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.