Teams

ACAC Bosch

2024 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 8.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.14 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-15vs 8.5 Captain Morgan's Stand at MACWon 20
W#1 DoublesBen Hall / William Price vs Keith Adams / Eric Nelson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeff Bosch / Michael Blackburn vs Warren Smigo / Steve Hamant1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-07vs Belmont Bond 007Split 11
L#1 DoublesWilliam Price / Nathan Arland vs Majd Babik / Randy Biltz4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Bosch / Ben Hall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-18vs SCC LinebergerLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Robinson / Diego Alejandro Parada vs Scott Broaddus / Geoff Usher6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJeff Bosch / Scott Kim vs Christopher Doern / Scott Steinour2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNathan Arland / Michael Blackburn vs Russ Haskin / Jay Nelson0-6, 3-6
2024-08-10vs Burkwood ButterworthLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Bosch / Ben Hall vs Ethan Belote / Jason DeHaven7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-04vs WW Ninjas - BakerLost 02
L#1 DoublesNathan Arland / William Price vs Fred Walker / Charles Wayland0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesScott Kim / Michael Blackburn vs Ryan Baker / Greg Robinson2-6, 4-6
2024-07-27vs MAC SnowLost 01
L#1 DoublesGabriel Venturi / Michael Blackburn vs Mycael McDowell / Dylan Brod3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.74
Diego Alejandro Parada
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.01
Scott Kim
published
3.98
Nathan Arland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.82
William Price
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Jeff Bosch
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.76
Gabriel Venturi
published
3.75
Chris Naughton
published 4
3.56
Michael Blackburn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.24
Craig Carman
published 3.5
Donald Polifka
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Price + Jeff Bosch3548% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Bosch + Michael Blackburn4350% gamesnot enough data
William Price + Michael Blackburn3253% gamesnot enough data
Nathan Arland + Michael Blackburn224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Diego Alejandro Parada
134W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.74
Scott Kim
4W–19L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Nathan Arland
82W–79L career · 3 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
William Price
98W–103L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Jeff Bosch
205W–176L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Gabriel Venturi
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.76
4
Chris Naughton
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Michael Blackburn
172W–174L career · 10 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Craig Carman
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Donald Polifka
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.