Teams

McMullen Oonk

2022 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over Weekend Winter · 8.0 W Saturday

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-23vs ELW HungivilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Oonk / Karen Fischer vs Michele Ironsmith / Mary Jacobs1-6, 4-6
2022-03-19vs Pinellas - SPTC/JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Oonk / Karen Fischer vs Tina Videtto / Karin Hartenbach3-6, 3-6
2022-02-26vs Pinellas - SPTC/JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesTori Disalvio / Deborah Golomb vs Anne Pulley / Kathy Moll4-6, 1-6
2022-02-19vs ELW HungivilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Oonk / Karen Fischer vs Patricia Ryan / Jaye Brown1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHolly Charles / Tori Disalvio vs Laura Hungiville / Kathleen Annichiarico6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-02-05vs Pinellas - SPTC/JohnsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesTori Disalvio / Dorothy Crosse vs Jamie Stein / Sandy Martin4-6, 4-6
2022-01-29vs ELW HungivilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesTori Disalvio / Deborah Golomb vs Michele Ironsmith / Wendy Unger6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-01-20vs ELW HungivilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesTori Disalvio / Deborah Golomb vs Laura Hungiville / Patricia Ryan6-2, 6-4
2022-01-15vs Pinellas - SPTC/JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Oonk / Karen Fischer vs Lucy Robertson / Kathy Moll3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Lisa Oonk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Deborah Golomb
published 4
Holly Charles
published 4
3.74
Tori Disalvio
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Mary Odum
published
3.12
Karen Fischer
published
Jean Cantu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tori Disalvio + Deborah Golomb224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lisa Oonk
217W–232L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Deborah Golomb
4W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Holly Charles
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Tori Disalvio
86W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Mary Odum
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
3.44
Karen Fischer
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Jean Cantu
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.