Teams

BTobia (Brookhaven)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-29vs AReynolds (CSRC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Kimberly Stafford vs Pam Tan / Kristen Ziemer3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesClaudia Ridley vs Amy Brittain6-2, 6-3
2022-04-22vs KLull (Bridgehampton)Split 11
L#1 DoublesHollis Marek / Brenda Tobia vs Christina McDonald / Helen Wood3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesClaudia Ridley vs Carol Scott6-2, 6-3
2022-04-08vs VWade (Springfield)Split 11
L#1 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Kimberly Stafford vs Lindsay Luton / Krista Stewart7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesClaudia Ridley vs Karin Flemming7-5, 6-4
2022-04-01vs TMacuga/JGraham (Park Crossing)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesClaudia Ridley / Brenda Tobia vs Kathryn Ford / Jaime Graham1-6, 1-6
2022-03-25vs SPurdy (Carmel)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesClaudia Ridley / Kimberly Stafford vs Carrie Carickhoff / Courtney Reichs Mixon3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Hollis Marek vs Abbie Dougherty / Mandi Mohammed5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-18vs DShealy/TRand (Firethorne)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Stafford / Brenda Tobia vs Wendy Hall / Breck Lindley4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesClaudia Ridley vs TARA RAND4-6, 2-6
2022-03-11vs KLoor/ACheek (Park Road)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesClaudia Ridley / Kimberly Stafford vs Kate Loor / Amanda Cheek5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Tabitha Hanson vs Leslie Culbertson / Julie Strack1-6, 2-6
2022-03-04vs CMondshane (Lifetime)Split 11
W#1 DoublesClaudia Ridley / Kimberly Stafford vs Lesly Carlton / Debbie Alexander6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Kelly Gilliam vs Cory Mondshane / Debra Holland1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Claudia Ridley
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
2.89
Erin Pacilli
published 3
2.81
Kimberly Stafford
published
2.76
Tabitha Hanson
published
2.64
Giulia Lanni
published 3
2.54
Brenda Tobia
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.24
Hollis Marek
published 2.5
Molly Tucker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Pacilli + Claudia Ridley4160% games+14.4% vs expected
Brenda Tobia + Claudia Ridley4155% gamesnot enough data
Erin Pacilli + Kimberly Stafford303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claudia Ridley
89W–68L career · 13 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Erin Pacilli
24W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.89
Kimberly Stafford
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Tabitha Hanson
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%2%98%
2.76
3
Giulia Lanni
4W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Brenda Tobia
32W–71L career · 8 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
2.54
2.5
Hollis Marek
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.24
Molly Tucker
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.