Teams

Re.Procter65M

2023 Cap 65 & Over Mixed · 8.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-13vs Ke.DeHaven65MSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMark Stephenson / Susan Doninger Greer vs Michell Wilson / Steven Wilson0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKenneth Gillespie / Elizabeth Samuels vs Fran Ange / Wally Hinkleman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-29vs Ke.DeHaven65MLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Doninger Greer / John Bruckel vs Fran Ange / Charles Venners6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSally Spetz / Kenneth Gillespie vs Michell Wilson / Steven Wilson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRebecca Procter / Mark Stephenson vs Mindy Dehaven / Ken Dehaven2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-06-15vs Ke.DeHaven65MLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Doninger Greer / John Bruckel vs Michell Wilson / Steven Wilson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTiare Smiley / Kenneth Gillespie vs Mindy Dehaven / Ken Dehaven4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Procter / Mark Stephenson vs Lola Youngman / William Weis6-0, 6-0
2023-06-08vs Ke.DeHaven65MWon 20
W#1 DoublesRebecca Procter / John Bruckel vs Wally Hinkleman / Susan King6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Doninger Greer / Mark Stephenson vs Linda Carroll / William Weis6-0, 6-3
2023-06-01vs Ke.DeHaven65MWon 20
W#2 DoublesKenneth Gillespie / Tiare Smiley vs Wally Hinkleman / Susan King6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Procter / Mark Stephenson vs Mindy Dehaven / Ken Dehaven6-2, 7-6
2023-05-25vs Ke.DeHaven65MWon 20
W#1 DoublesTiare Smiley / Kenneth Gillespie vs Fran Ange / William Weis6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Bruckel / Rebecca Procter vs Susan King / Wally Hinkleman6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Rebecca Procter
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.38
Susan Doninger Greer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.34
Kenneth Gillespie
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
John Bruckel
published
John Winn
published
Linda Winn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Procter + Kenneth Gillespie4167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rebecca Procter
185W–147L career · 5 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Susan Doninger Greer
97W–125L career · 4 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.38
3.5
Kenneth Gillespie
51W–64L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
4
Elizabeth Samuels
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.33
John Bruckel
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Winn
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Winn
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.