Teams

MD.Sninski

2025 CTRL Mixed 40 & Over · Mixed 40 & Over 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-20vs TOC.GoetzLost 01
L#1 DoublesDabney Sninski / Todd Sninski vs Bracha Blanc / Sud Ramasamy5-7, 1-6
2025-07-18vs TOC.GoetzLost 01
L#3 DoublesKendra McCormick / Mark McCormick vs Mary Wilson / Paul Goetz5-7, 1-6
2025-07-13vs TOC.LeahyWon 20
W#1 DoublesDabney Sninski / Todd Sninski vs Jennifer Leahy / David Mize5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKendra McCormick / Mark McCormick vs Kimberley Ashmore / Eli Rodriguez6-4, 6-3
2025-07-06vs ANP.LennonWon 10
W#3 DoublesJessica Tanaka / Brian Tanaka vs Yuna Kim / Samuel Kim4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-11vs TOC.HollettSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKendra McCormick / Mark McCormick vs Mary T Long / Robert Long6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJessica Tanaka / Brian Tanaka vs Sharon Fadelici / Anthony Puccio3-6, 3-6
2025-06-08vs TOC.LeahyWon 10
W#2 DoublesDabney Sninski / Todd Sninski vs Jennifer Leahy / James Dobson6-2, 6-2
2025-06-01vs ANP.LennonLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatie Klingemann / Bradley Klingemann vs Christine Lennon / Will Lennon6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Tanaka / Brian Tanaka vs Katie Lilly / Walter Tita6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 40 & Over 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Angie Bostrom
published 3.5
2.94
Katie Klingemann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Mark McCormick
published
2.77
Dabney Sninski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Kendra McCormick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Brian Tanaka
published 3
2.55
King Bostrom
published
2.50
Deanna Hart
published 3
2.39
Jessica Tanaka
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kendra McCormick + Mark McCormick134 matchesnot enough data
Brian Tanaka + Jessica Tanaka224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angie Bostrom
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
3
Katie Klingemann
96W–62L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Mark McCormick
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Dabney Sninski
86W–104L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Kendra McCormick
54W–124L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Brian Tanaka
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
King Bostrom
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Deanna Hart
4W–15L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
2.5
Jessica Tanaka
20W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.