Teams

GBeal/Mackie (GCC)

2022 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Tues PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-03vs NHerland (Raintree)Won 10
W#3 DoublesGiles Beal / Ronnie Rawdon vs Norman Herland / Chris Vogelsong7-5, 6-4
2022-04-26vs JMorse (JCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJordan Shields / Ronnie Rawdon vs RONALD TOWNSEND / David Solganik6-4, 6-1
2022-04-12vs DMurchElliot (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJordan Shields / MARK TERRIO vs Joseph Blocksom / Michael Rousseaux1-6, 5-7
2022-04-10vs PGriffiths (OPRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesSpurgeon Mackie / MARK TERRIO vs Addison May / Gerald Quattlebaum6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-03-29vs NHerland (Raintree)Won 20
W#2 DoublesSpurgeon Mackie / MARK TERRIO vs Ty Leonard / Ed Locke6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGiles Beal / Ronnie Rawdon vs Norman Herland / Chris Vogelsong6-0, 6-0
2022-03-15vs ALawler (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRonnie Rawdon / Spurgeon Mackie vs Graham Phillips / Ken Klug6-2, 6-1
2022-03-01vs DMurchElliot (Weddington)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRonnie Rawdon / Giles Beal vs Michael Dorsel / Joseph Blocksom6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesGiles Beal / Ronnie Rawdon vs Peter McCranie Jr / J Figard6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Joseph Gann
published
3.57
MARK TERRIO
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Giles Beal
published 3.5
3.38
Ronnie Rawdon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Don Miller
published 3.5
3.12
Howard Epstein
published 3.5
2.80
Rick Nicholson
published
Jordan Shields
published
Phillip Morgan
published
Spurgeon Mackie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MARK TERRIO + Giles Beal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Gann
8W–14L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
MARK TERRIO
126W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%28%72%
3.57
3.5
Giles Beal
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Ronnie Rawdon
157W–81L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Don Miller
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Howard Epstein
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
Rick Nicholson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.80
Jordan Shields
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Phillip Morgan
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Spurgeon Mackie
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.