Teams

He.Remley18A5.0

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-11vs El.Hodges18AWon 21
L#1 DoublesNena Marks / Mia Caruana vs Elizabeth Hodges / Jamie Breunig3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAnastasiya Manet vs Angelina Neiberger6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Boesch / Heather Remley vs Ivette Duran / Paula Collado Cordon6-1, 6-3
2025-05-04vs Em.Perry18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer McEntee / Paula Fernandez-Pita vs Jeni Burnette / Sarah Barnhill0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNena Marks vs Virginia Jenkins6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHeather Remley / Jennifer Reese vs MacY Fisher / Anne Frautschi5-7, 3-6
2025-04-20vs El.Hodges18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesNena Marks / Mia Caruana vs Laura Alvarez / Rosa Tapia6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAnastasiya Manet vs Tanita Tedamrongwanish7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJessica Baker / Paula Fernandez-Pita vs Mary-Katherine Martin / Elizabeth Hodges1-6, 4-6
2025-04-13vs Em.Perry18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarrie Perkis / Brandy Kmiec vs Emily Perry / Jeni Burnette2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAnastasiya Manet vs Alice Stubbs7-5, 7-6
2025-03-30vs El.Hodges18ASplit 11
W#1 SinglesPaula Fernandez-Pita vs Paula Collado Cordon3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNena Marks / Jessica Baker vs Rosa Tapia / Angelina Neiberger1-6, 6-7
2025-03-23vs Em.Perry18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesNena Marks / Mia Caruana vs Jeni Burnette / Emily Perry5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAnastasiya Manet vs Virginia Jenkins4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Remley / Dawn Kitner vs Kelly Moler Glass / MacY Fisher6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-09vs El.Hodges18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeslie Boesch / Dawn Kitner vs Ivette Duran / Rosa Tapia3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAnastasiya Manet vs Jamie Breunig6-4, 6-3
2025-03-02vs Em.Perry18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesAnastasiya Manet / Brandy Kmiec vs Jeni Burnette / Emily Perry5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLeslie Boesch vs Virginia Jenkins5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaula Fernandez-Pita / Dawn Kitner vs Sarah Barnhill / Kelly Moler Glass0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.54 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.90
Nena Marks
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 5
Carrie Perkis
published 5
4.69
Anastasiya Manet
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 5
4.66
Paula Fernandez-Pita
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 5
4.45
Mia Caruana
published
4.43
Leslie Boesch
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.42
Heather Remley
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 5
4.42
Jennifer Reese
published
4.34
Brandy Kmiec
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Boesch + Heather Remley3455% games+7.6% vs expected
Brandy Kmiec + Nena Marks404 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Reese + Heather Remley033 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Reese + Brandy Kmiec213 matchesnot enough data
Nena Marks + Anastasiya Manet303 matchesnot enough data
Nena Marks + Mia Caruana213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Nena Marks
90W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.90
5
Carrie Perkis
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Anastasiya Manet
32W–21L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.69
5
Paula Fernandez-Pita
148W–60L career · type D · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.66
Mia Caruana
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
4.45
4.5
Leslie Boesch
245W–102L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.43
5
Heather Remley
298W–155L career · 8 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
4.42
Jennifer Reese
30W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Brandy Kmiec
107W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
4.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.