Teams

5/15 Refund

2024 Adult 55 and Over League · Refund

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Refund
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
15/15 Refund000000
23/31 Refund000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Todd Hall
published
4.36
Alan Gehrich
published 4.5
4.27
Gerald Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Tim Kelley
published 4.5
4.06
Mark Watkins
published
Mark Kobayashi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Kelley + Todd Hall392357% games+3.4% vs expected
Mark Watkins + Todd Hall4166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Hall
86W–50L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
4.39
4.5
Alan Gehrich
30W–23L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Gerald Davis
66W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Tim Kelley
134W–112L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.08
Mark Watkins
30W–43L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
Mark Kobayashi
28W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.