Teams

Pope

2026 NE Adult 40&Over · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-08vs MartinWon 31
W#1 DoublesStacy Pickering / Christa Pope vs Denise Johnson / Cynthia Workman6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSheema Budler vs Tory Jorgensen6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTerri Dunlap / Nancy Johnson vs Terri Fuxa / Beth Stiles3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMELISSA HERSHBERGER / Stephanie Randall vs Maxine Martin / Tammy Weber6-3, 6-1
2026-02-08vs NE/Irwin/40&Over4.0WSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Lubben / Terri Dunlap vs Sandra Zebrowski / Teri Barnard1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAngela Boule vs Anna Thomas1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChrista Pope / Stacy Pickering vs Cathy Fluckey / Jillian Bateman6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Strawhecker / Sheema Budler vs Cynthia Waldrop / Julie Seevers7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2026-02-01vs ReinersWon 31
W#1 DoublesStacy Pickering / Terri Dunlap vs Jodi Anderson / Catherine Porath6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTammy Tegler vs Jodi Nelson4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJane Strawhecker / Sheema Budler vs Karen Reiners / Lisa Woito-Petty7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMELISSA HERSHBERGER / Stephanie Randall vs Myong Choi / Deb Bitzer6-2, 7-6
2026-01-25vs GoldappWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Lubben / Mikaela Hanson vs Iona Pavlik / Amy Mciver6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChrista Pope / Stacy Pickering vs Amanda Dana / Tara Arnold6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Hiser / MELISSA HERSHBERGER vs Erin Finnigsmier / Meredith Weitz7-5, 7-5
2026-01-18vs HeardLost 13
L#1 DoublesChrista Pope / Stacy Pickering vs Janet Messman / Angeline Larson3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAngela Boule vs Kari Stempson0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJane Strawhecker / Nancy Johnson vs Heather Blumel / Elizabeth Kingston3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAlexandra Lubben / Tammy Tegler vs Kimberly Gradoville / Lisa Thomas6-4, 7-6
2026-01-11vs HazelriggWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Lubben / Terri Dunlap vs Amy Studts / Jennifer Christensen6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStacy Pickering / Christa Pope vs Cheryl Schmidt / Allison Arntz6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTammy Tegler / Nancy Johnson vs Anne Conlon / Kirsten Holm-Caskey6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Irwin/40&Over4.0W6017718177
2Heard5116820188
3Pope4216818195
4Hazelrigg0671738261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Arnold
published 4
3.69
Christa Pope
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.59
Alexandra Lubben
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Mikaela Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Sheema Budler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Stacy Pickering
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Jane Strawhecker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Tammy Tegler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.26
MELISSA HERSHBERGER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Terri Dunlap
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Stephanie Randall
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.06
Angela Boule
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Hiser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christa Pope + Stacy Pickering25563% games+10.2% vs expected
Terri Dunlap + Alexandra Lubben25460% games+6.9% vs expected
Terri Dunlap + Tammy Tegler5262% games+4.4% vs expected
Stacy Pickering + MELISSA HERSHBERGER8555% games−0.7% vs expected
MELISSA HERSHBERGER + Stephanie Randall314 matchesnot enough data
Christa Pope + MELISSA HERSHBERGER213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Hiser + MELISSA HERSHBERGER303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Arnold
6W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Christa Pope
61W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Alexandra Lubben
83W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.59
Mikaela Hanson
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
Sheema Budler
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.39
Stacy Pickering
105W–55L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Jane Strawhecker
66W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Tammy Tegler
125W–155L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
MELISSA HERSHBERGER
60W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.26
Terri Dunlap
73W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.26
Stephanie Randall
41W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
3.5
Angela Boule
20W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
Elizabeth Hiser
35W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.