Teams

PETALUMA TA/LEGHORNS PK 55AW7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 7.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.39 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chris Korte
published 4
3.51
Dana Eaton
published 3.5
3.42
Jennifer Anakar
published
3.39
Nicole Genelly
published
3.33
Genene Pedrotti
published 3.5
3.31
Kathy Harold
published
3.27
Marti Gerstner
published
3.27
Julie Fishman
published
3.26
Jonell Langley
published
3.25
Lisa Hilbert
published
3.20
3.16
Chris Homen
published 3.5
3.13
Michele Andersen
published
3.07
Barbara Eastman
published 3.5
3.02
Rocely Chu
published
2.98
Sangeeta Dighe
published
2.97
Ann Gors
published 3.5
2.92
Deborah Jordan
published 3
2.82
Gillian Galligan
published 3
2.81
Valerie Montague
published
2.63
Carolann Jones
published 3
Kiyoe Logan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Eaton + Julie Fishman5550% games−2.1% vs expected
Kathy Harold + Julie Fishman2446% gamesnot enough data
Julie Fishman + Michele Andersen224 matchesnot enough data
Dana Eaton + Genene Pedrotti303 matchesnot enough data
Marti Gerstner + Julie Fishman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Korte
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dana Eaton
18W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Jennifer Anakar
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
Nicole Genelly
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Genene Pedrotti
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Kathy Harold
4W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
Marti Gerstner
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Julie Fishman
20W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Jonell Langley
9W–25L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Lisa Hilbert
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Jill Manning Sartori
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Chris Homen
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
Michele Andersen
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Barbara Eastman
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
Rocely Chu
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Sangeeta Dighe
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
3.5
Ann Gors
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Deborah Jordan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Gillian Galligan
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Valerie Montague
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.81
3
Carolann Jones
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Kiyoe Logan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.