Teams

JLee/ESalim (Queens)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-25vs KGreathouse (Park Road)Split 11
W#1 DoublesColleen Chance / Hillary Kroboth vs Jane Bee / Elizabeth Murphy2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCathy Cagney / Teresa Riley vs Annie Hart / Katie Perry5-7, 1-6
2024-09-18vs PStyers (Southampton)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLea Powell / Felicia Ahn vs Kim Rivera / Michelle Davis3-6, 4-6
2024-09-11vs ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#2 DoublesFelicia Ahn / Megan Pruski vs Amanda Cheek / Julie Strack6-0, 6-0
2024-08-21vs JGentile (WSRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Pruski / Felicia Ahn vs Amy Barrett / Kelli Massaro2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLea Powell / Teresa Riley vs Wendy Ranadive / Courtney Warner6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHillary Kroboth / Colleen Chance vs Jacqui Gentile / Kathleen O'Donnell7-5, 6-2
W#1 DoublesFelicia Ahn / Rosemarie Kafka vs Lorna O'Callaghan / Tracy McLaughlin6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCathy Cagney / Jenny Kim vs Kathy Sawrey / Ann Marie Selee6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Elisa Salim
published 4
3.72
Megan Pruski
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.43
Nancy Liu
published
3.40
Hillary Kroboth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Felicia Ahn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Kris Jones
published
3.34
Lea Powell
published
3.31
Cathy Cagney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Rosemarie Kafka
published
2.99
Teresa Riley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jane Lee
published
Sun Moon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Felicia Ahn + Nancy Liu6358% games+6.9% vs expected
Teresa Riley + Kris Jones4351% games+1.9% vs expected
Elisa Salim + Felicia Ahn5170% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Riley + Hillary Kroboth044 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Cagney + Kris Jones303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elisa Salim
71W–28L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Megan Pruski
71W–57L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
Nancy Liu
32W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Hillary Kroboth
87W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Felicia Ahn
90W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
Kris Jones
33W–42L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39
Lea Powell
17W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Cathy Cagney
47W–46L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
Rosemarie Kafka
33W–34L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Teresa Riley
71W–75L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
Jane Lee
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sun Moon
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.