← Teams

MAC-Casebeer

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Deana Julka
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Sara Crate
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Jennifer Stevenson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Desiree Bliss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Christine Bennett-Hanes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Kayla Casebeer
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.21
Sara Vanderhoff
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Melanie Morris
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Barbara Gram
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.72
Madeleine Bourland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-06-12Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Deana Julka vs Heidi Palena / Ericka Nelson7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJennifer Stevenson vs Heidi Kjos5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMegan Heyworth / Sara Crate vs Amy Hicks / Molly Wilson6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-04Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesSara Vanderhoff vs Laura Flath6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMegan Heyworth / Sara Crate vs Sumner Brooks / Jennifer Trank3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelissa Jacobs / Christine Bennett-Hanes vs Linnette Donohue / Lillian Lee6-1, 6-0
2022-05-22Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesBarbara Gram / Sara Vanderhoff vs Christina Melander / Valerie Neill6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelanie Morris / Sara Crate vs Shannon Davis / Joanna Asia Wagner6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristine Bennett-Hanes / Deana Julka vs Michelle Cortez / Jessica Hutchins6-0, 6-1
2022-05-15Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Edwardeen Hilts vs Tamara Phillips / Delena Palena7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMelanie Morris vs Alisa Rakoz6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDesiree Bliss / Megan Heyworth vs Jill Watson / Donna Weyand6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Julie Motschenbacher vs Cyndi Johnson / Laura Kaufman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-14Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Deana Julka vs Alisa Rakoz / Delena Palena6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJennifer Stevenson vs ROSY ALANIS7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSara Crate / Barbara Gram vs Cyndi Johnson / Margaret Huck6-2, 6-1
2022-05-07Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesSara Vanderhoff vs Jennifer Pultz6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMelissa Jacobs / Desiree Bliss vs Kate Quisling / Kate Maher6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Kayla Casebeer vs Luz Zanavich / Tracy Moffett6-1, 6-1
2022-04-30Won 3–0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Stevenson vs Heidi Kjos6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSara Crate / Courtney Laing vs Rebecca Griffith / Ericka Nelson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Deana Julka vs Molly Wilson / Amy Hicks6-0, 6-2
2022-04-23Split 1–1
W#1 SinglesMelanie Morris vs Kendra Rothert6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney Laing / Sara Crate vs Stephanie Hoover / Jean Schnadig3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Deana Julka
69W–28L career
6%94%0%
3.65
3.5
Sara Crate
92W–86L career
0%88%12%
3.47
3.5
Jennifer Stevenson
91W–97L career
0%96%4%
3.41
3.5
Desiree Bliss
65W–35L career
0%95%5%
3.39
3.5
Christine Bennett-Hanes
84W–61L career
0%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Kayla Casebeer
93W–63L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Sara Vanderhoff
62W–20L career
3%97%0%
3.21
3
Melanie Morris
25W–25L career
0%90%10%
2.94
3
Barbara Gram
127W–129L career
0%97%3%
2.89
3
Madeleine Bourland
64W–53L career
2%98%0%
2.72

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.