Teams

HILLS/Adult18&over6.0W/Apollo Beach - J. Feeney

2026 Hillsborough Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-13vs Hunters Green - E. VickersWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Montembeault / Donna Whiting vs Theresa Mays / Karen Cleland6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCissy Barr / Ginger Marchiniak vs Pat Morris / Carmen Heggen6-4, 7-5
L#1 DoublesMary Raymond / Cissy Barr vs Kathleen Norton / Kelsey B Nix1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGinger Marchiniak / Donna Whiting vs Margaret McGillivray / Kathleen Gafarian6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmalia Alaniz / Jane Feeney vs Lynn Malarz / Nancy Matuszak2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-02-27vs Plant City 65+ - P. SmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Montembeault / Donna Whiting vs Catherine Mueller / Kandy Wood6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJane Feeney / Amalia Alaniz vs Leisa Jordan / Patricia Smith2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Raymond / Ginger Marchiniak vs Susan Sommerfield / Julianna Holbrook5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2026-02-20vs Hunters Green - E. VickersWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Montembeault / Donna Whiting vs Pamela Woodham / Amy Rairigh6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJane Feeney / Amalia Alaniz vs Peggy Pusateri / Ellen Ghelardi3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGinger Marchiniak / Cissy Barr vs Theresa Mays / Karen Cleland6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDonna Whiting / Amalia Alaniz vs Kathleen Gafarian / Margaret McGillivray6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCissy Barr / Ginger Marchiniak vs Debra Lowe / Kathleen Norton5-7, 1-6
2026-02-06vs Plant City 65+ - P. SmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Montembeault / Mary Raymond vs Catherine Mueller / Karen Bateman7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Whiting / Amalia Alaniz vs Patricia Smith / Margaret Huggins6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJane Feeney / Cissy Barr vs Sheila Brown / Julianna Holbrook6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2026-01-30vs Hunters Green - E. VickersLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Dolan / Donna Whiting vs Karen Cachion / Pat Morris4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Montembeault / Mary Raymond vs Karen Cleland / Theresa Mays4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmalia Alaniz / Ginger Marchiniak vs Peggy Pusateri / Amy Rairigh2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesBarbara Dolan / Ginger Marchiniak vs Kathleen Gafarian / Margaret McGillivray3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMary Raymond / Karen Montembeault vs Kathleen Norton / Renee Hovden5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Whiting / Amalia Alaniz vs Sharon Lucas / Karen Johnson3-6, 5-7
2026-01-16vs Plant City 65+ - P. SmithWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Montembeault / Donna Whiting vs Catherine Mueller / Karen Bateman1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Dolan / Ginger Marchiniak vs Susan Sommerfield / Dorothy Flair6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJane Feeney / Amalia Alaniz vs Jo Morton / Kandy Wood6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Cissy Barr
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.51
Amalia Alaniz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.32
Barbara Dolan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Donna Whiting
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Ginger Marchiniak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Jane Feeney
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Karen Montembeault
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Mary Raymond
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Whiting + Karen Montembeault5165% gamesnot enough data
Jane Feeney + Amalia Alaniz1440% gamesnot enough data
Donna Whiting + Amalia Alaniz134 matchesnot enough data
Cissy Barr + Ginger Marchiniak314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Raymond + Karen Montembeault314 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Dolan + Mary Raymond123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cissy Barr
7W–6L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Amalia Alaniz
2W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Barbara Dolan
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.32
Donna Whiting
18W–31L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ginger Marchiniak
6W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jane Feeney
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Montembeault
9W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Raymond
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.