Teams

SCHAEFER/ BRILL- River Creek

2022 Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.57 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-27vs TENHAEFF - A.FARMSWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen McFarlane / Pamela Nix vs Josephine Hughes / Kimberly Murray6-4, 6-1
2022-07-20vs KOTTER- AVSPSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTara Brill / Coni Schaefer vs Paula Garrison / Heather Iasso6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPamela Nix / Tina Le vs Caroline Mia Lee / Tina Woods5-7, 3-4
2022-07-18vs Mood Swings - AVSPWon 20
W#1 DoublesTara Brill / Kathy Hoehner vs Leanne Drake / Donna James6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDeb Dratch / Elizabeth Font vs Mary Beth Greason / Sharon DiRenzo6-2, 6-1
2022-07-13vs Mood Swings - AVSPSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPamela Nix / Kathleen McFarlane vs Beth Koyne / Elizabeth Pyszka6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDeb Dratch / Elizabeth Font vs Kerry Smith / Mary Beth Greason4-6, 4-6
2022-07-06vs TENHAEFF - A.FARMSWon 10
W#1 DoublesTara Brill / Lisa Zimmerman vs Josephine Hughes / Deanne Iverson6-2, 6-1
2022-06-22vs TENHAEFF - A.FARMSLost 01
L#2 DoublesDeb Dratch / Elizabeth Font vs Josephine Hughes / Kimberly Murray3-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Tara Brill
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Kendall Mccaughey
published
3.36
Tina Le
published
3.32
Elizabeth Font
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Deb Dratch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Pamela Nix
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Kathleen McFarlane
published
3.25
Anne Flam
published 3.5
3.19
Kate Putt
published
3.17
Coni Schaefer
published 3.5
3.07
Jeannie Matteson
published
2.97
Danielle Davis
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Flam + Coni Schaefer1446% games+0.7% vs expected
Deb Dratch + Elizabeth Font101050% games+0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tara Brill
125W–88L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Kendall Mccaughey
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
Tina Le
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Elizabeth Font
56W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Deb Dratch
56W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Pamela Nix
193W–201L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Kathleen McFarlane
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Anne Flam
6W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
Kate Putt
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Coni Schaefer
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Jeannie Matteson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Danielle Davis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.