Teams

CCC PARKS

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Saturday Ladies 2.5

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-07vs RC REYNOLDS/BARRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlison Conlee / Jennifer Omana vs Maggie Krenek / Alyssa Foster3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Winfrey vs Haley Snell6-2, 6-1
2025-03-29vs WAL MIONELost 02
L#1 DoublesHannah Parks / Emily Winfrey vs Carolyn Peterson / Apryl Henrichs4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Omana / Alison Conlee vs Tina Pierce / Jan Millhouser1-6, 3-6
2025-03-24vs MCL CANDELARIALost 12
L#1 DoublesTracy Cannell / Alison Conlee vs Erin Hahn / Caroline Meekins0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesHannah Parks vs Nilza Boldenow6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLee Anne Leonard / Emily Winfrey vs Paro Norris / Sharon Ogbonna6-0, 6-4
2025-03-09vs RC REYNOLDS/BARRSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLee Anne Leonard / Emily Winfrey vs Rachel Lang / Alyssa Foster6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlison Conlee / Tracy Cannell vs Maggie Krenek / Anna Barr4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-01vs WAL MIONELost 12
L#1 DoublesHannah Parks / Jennifer Omana vs Shannon Lee / Apryl Henrichs0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAlison Conlee vs Carolyn Peterson0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Winfrey / Lee Anne Leonard vs Ana Lucas / Theresa Kell6-0, 6-2
2025-02-23vs MCL CANDELARIALost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Omana / Emily Winfrey vs Michelle Ebbens / Jen Wagner4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHannah Parks / Alison Conlee vs Alexis Quan / Erin Hahn0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Saturday Ladies 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Lee Anne Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Emily Winfrey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.31
Tracy Cannell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.06
Alison Conlee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.97
Jennifer Omana
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Hannah Parks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Anne Leonard + Emily Winfrey4167% games+13.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lee Anne Leonard
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Emily Winfrey
7W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.41
Tracy Cannell
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Alison Conlee
6W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Jennifer Omana
0W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Hannah Parks
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.