Teams

Glenmore - Johnston

2026 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule15 played
W#1 DoublesAndrea Wilder / Nerissa Rouzer vs Jeanette Wang / Susan Brooks6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEllen Schaff / Pam Socolow vs Jennifer Keevil / Mimi Scully6-1, 6-1
2026-06-03vs FL - SanfordLost 02
L#1 DoublesPam Socolow / Shirlee Randall vs Lynette Sanford / Shauna Hogg2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesNerissa Rouzer vs Kelly Guyton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-03vs BHSC - SwitzerWon 21
W#1 DoublesNerissa Rouzer / Kathleen Edwards vs Patricia Clifford / Melissa Grossman7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKatie Sions vs Kathryn Harris6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPam Socolow / Ellen Schaff vs Jessica Kinnick / Kelly Owens7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-01vs BHSC McCulloch - The Fun BunchLost 01
L#3 DoublesPam Socolow / Marie Hassanova vs Isabel Freisitzer / Janet Miller2-6, 4-6
2026-05-31vs ACAC - Odom 2.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesPam Socolow / Diane Wright vs Lisa Christianson / Diane Espinosa6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesNerissa Rouzer vs Candice van der Linde6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Nash / Ellen Schaff vs Ann Jones / Wendi Cook7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-20vs FCC - Woodriff- 3.0 #2Lost 02
L#2 SinglesJulie Nash vs Loring Woodriff2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPam Socolow / Andrea Wilder vs Katherine Jane Powell / Courtney Sievers1-6, 0-6
2026-05-17vs BHSC - Cook DommerWon 21
W#1 DoublesPam Socolow / Julie Nash vs Annette Lombard / Virginia Mcmillin6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAndrea Wilder vs Isabel Freisitzer3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNerissa Rouzer / Kathleen Edwards vs Ellen McAllister / Chelsie Garriott6-0, 7-5
2026-05-13vs LM - Ward - Sweet SetsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesNerissa Rouzer vs Blair Hubbard7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAndrea Wilder vs Cecilia Monge0-6, 6-7
2026-05-13vs BHSC - SwitzerWon 21
L#1 DoublesKatie Sions / Kathleen Edwards vs Molly Switzer / Katherine Mcnerney0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNerissa Rouzer vs Sherry Lake6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesPam Socolow / Diane Wright vs Jessica Kinnick / Nancy Polonitza6-3, 6-4
2026-05-12vs BHSC Kastendike - Volley GirlsLost 12
L#1 SinglesNerissa Rouzer vs Diana Whitten2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAndrea Wilder vs Chandler Steinbrugge7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPam Socolow / Allison Egidi vs Jill Lerner / Monica Prichard6-4, 6-1
2026-05-06vs ACAC Racquettes - FoleySplit 11
L#1 SinglesJulie Nash vs Christina Meyer0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Egidi / Nerissa Rouzer vs Courtney Wenleder / Patricia Foley6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesAndrea Wilder / Nerissa Rouzer vs Jeanette Wang / Mackie Gilchrist6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKatie Sions vs Lauren Holzman2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPam Socolow / Julie Nash vs Mimi Scully / Susan Brooks6-2, 6-3
2026-04-27vs BHSC - Keener - The Slice GirlsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPam Socolow / Marie Hassanova vs Jannemieke Keener / Patricia Irby0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesNerissa Rouzer vs Amy Bouton3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-22vs ACAC - Odom 2.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesNerissa Rouzer / Kathleen Edwards vs Ann Hague / Ann Jones6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulie Nash vs Danielle Coccomo6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPam Socolow / Ellen Schaff vs Judy Gelber / Apitchaya Miller5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-12vs BHSC - Cook DommerWon 21
W#1 DoublesNerissa Rouzer / Kathleen Edwards vs Abigail Cook Dommer / Ellen McAllister6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKatie Sions vs Annette Lombard2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPam Socolow / Ellen Schaff vs Janel Kasparson / Liane Houseknecht6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Nerissa Rouzer
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
2.53
Andrea Wilder
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.43
Pam Socolow
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
2.38
Julie Nash
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.32
Diane Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.29
Ellen Schaff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Katie Sions
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.07
Kathleen Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Socolow + Ellen Schaff5456% games−3.0% vs expected
Kathleen Edwards + Nerissa Rouzer5156% gamesnot enough data
Nerissa Rouzer + Andrea Wilder4167% gamesnot enough data
Pam Socolow + Julie Nash213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nerissa Rouzer
19W–8L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.68
2.5
Andrea Wilder
5W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.53
Pam Socolow
13W–15L career · 13 lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.43
Julie Nash
4W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.38
2.5
Diane Wright
4W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
Ellen Schaff
5W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
Katie Sions
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Kathleen Edwards
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.