Teams

Tampa palms Terminetters - C. Guidera

2023 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-31vs Cheval - B. BurdetteWon 10
W#1 DoublesNikki Spirakis / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Danielle Lindblom / Cornelia Eckert6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNikki Spirakis / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Sheila Calistri / Sara Kim4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarrie Bradley / Roseann McNichol vs Laurie Powell / Devin Mequio6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-10-17vs Van Dyke Farms - P. MooreLost 02
L#1 DoublesCatherine Hoyord / Carrie Bradley vs Stephanie van Brocklin / Kara Buchholz-Ashenbaugh0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTricia Cardoso / Cindy Arment vs Mary Dressler / Michelle Barry4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 DoublesNikki Spirakis / Tricia Cardoso vs Anne Marie Lennox / Laura Bleacher6-0, 6-2
L#1 DoublesTricia Cardoso / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Rebecca Gaier / Kelley Coffey6-7, 0-6
2022-09-26vs Grand Hampton - L. BacardiWon 21
L#1 DoublesNikki Spirakis / Karen Cleland vs Lourdes Bacardi / Carol Snyder0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSherry Peterson / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Denise Stone / Debbie Welsh6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Hoyord / Carrie Bradley vs Efza Turantekin / Fabiola Morales7-5, 6-3
2022-09-19vs Westchase Winners - P. HayesWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarrie Bradley / Wendy Seybold vs Carmen Fiorito / Zalila Leclercq6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Cille Williams
published 3
2.99
Wei Xue
published
2.90
Annmarie Iwanicki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Nikki Spirakis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Sherry Peterson
published
2.73
Cindy Arment
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Carol Guidera
published 3
2.67
Theresa Mays
published
2.64
Elizabeth DeConti
published
2.63
Tricia Cardoso
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Pamela Woodham
published
2.59
Carrie Bradley
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Jihea Helme
published
2.56
Roseann McNichol
published
2.54
Carmen Heggen
published 3
2.51
Karen Cleland
published
2.50
Catherine Hoyord
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Arment + Tricia Cardoso151453% games+5.5% vs expected
Tricia Cardoso + Annmarie Iwanicki241153% games−0.9% vs expected
Carrie Bradley + Tricia Cardoso6750% gamesnot enough data
Karen Cleland + Theresa Mays1638% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Arment + Annmarie Iwanicki1546% gamesnot enough data
Tricia Cardoso + Nikki Spirakis5159% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Arment + Carrie Bradley4161% gamesnot enough data
Annmarie Iwanicki + Nikki Spirakis404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cille Williams
62W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
Wei Xue
22W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Annmarie Iwanicki
85W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Nikki Spirakis
120W–96L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%79%20%
2.88
Sherry Peterson
21W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Cindy Arment
50W–43L career · 1 line in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Carol Guidera
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Theresa Mays
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Elizabeth DeConti
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
Tricia Cardoso
76W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
Pamela Woodham
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Carrie Bradley
49W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
2.59
Jihea Helme
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
Roseann McNichol
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Carmen Heggen
5W–15L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
Karen Cleland
3W–14L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Catherine Hoyord
4W–17L career · type A · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
Kasia Dolinska-Timoszuk
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.