Teams

Eccles - Kossover, Topeka

2021 KS 40 & Over Adult Outdoor League · 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-05-19vs KS/Seitz/40&Over3.5MLost 03
L#1 DoublesEdward Mcmurphy / Donald Arnold vs Scott Ritter / Mark Herman1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWalter Trammell / Berry Wanless vs Matt Barker / Mark Bettis3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRodney Bleich / Mark Underwood vs Troy Fay / Juan C Ramirez-Mares2-6, 2-6
2021-05-12vs KS/Seitz/40&Over3.5MLost 13
L#1 DoublesDon Eccles / Rodney Bleich vs Ben Seitz / Randy Knight0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDonald Arnold vs Juan C Ramirez-Mares3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEdward Mcmurphy / Berry Wanless vs Scott Ritter / Troy Fay3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDon Hoffman / Walter Trammell vs Mark Kohls / Matt Barker0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-05-05vs KS/Seitz/40&Over3.5MLost 13
L#1 DoublesDon Eccles / Don Hoffman vs Ben Seitz / Scott Ritter0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEdward Mcmurphy vs Troy Fay7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBerry Wanless / Charles Bonebrake vs Mark Bettis / Mark Kohls6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDonald Arnold / David Thurbon vs Randy Knight / Juan C Ramirez-Mares6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2021-04-28vs KS/Seitz/40&Over3.5MLost 13
L#1 DoublesMark Underwood / Walter Trammell vs Scott Ritter / Ben Seitz0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesChris Demas vs Randy Knight6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLewis Lenard / Don Hoffman vs Mark Kohls / Matt Barker2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Bonebrake / David Thurbon vs Mark Herman / Brett Klausman2-6, 2-6
2021-04-25vs KS/Seitz/40&Over3.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesEdward Mcmurphy / Rodney Bleich vs Troy Fay / Randy Knight1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDonald Arnold vs Mark Kohls0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBerry Wanless / Lewis Lenard vs Ben Seitz / Scott Ritter2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDon Eccles / David Thurbon vs Mark Herman / Sachin Bharati2-6, 2-6
2021-04-25vs KS/Seitz/40&Over3.5MLost 13
L#1 DoublesDon Eccles / Lewis Lenard vs Ben Seitz / Mark Herman2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEdward Mcmurphy vs Sachin Bharati6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDon Hoffman / Walter Trammell vs Troy Fay / Randy Knight0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBerry Wanless / Charles Bonebrake vs Scott Ritter / Juan C Ramirez-Mares3-6, 5-7
2021-04-17vs KS/Seitz/40&Over3.5MLost 13
L#1 DoublesEdward Mcmurphy / Berry Wanless vs Scott Ritter / Ben Seitz2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesChris Demas vs Juan C Ramirez-Mares6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDonald Arnold / Don Eccles vs Mark Herman / Brett Klausman2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDon Hoffman / David Thurbon vs Randy Knight / Troy Fay0-6, 1-6
2021-04-17vs KS/Seitz/40&Over3.5MLost 13
L#1 DoublesRodney Bleich / Berry Wanless vs Scott Ritter / Ben Seitz2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesWalter Trammell vs Juan C Ramirez-Mares6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEdward Mcmurphy / Chris Demas vs Mark Herman / Brett Klausman1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMark Underwood / Donald Arnold vs Randy Knight / Troy Fay1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chris Demas
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Edward Mcmurphy
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
2.90
Don Eccles
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Berry Wanless
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Charles Bonebrake
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
David Thurbon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Don Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Donald Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Lewis Lenard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Underwood
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rodney Bleich
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Walter Trammell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donald Arnold + David Thurbon044 matchesnot enough data
Edward Mcmurphy + Berry Wanless224 matchesnot enough data
Chris Demas + Rodney Bleich213 matchesnot enough data
David Thurbon + Rodney Bleich123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Demas
38W–26L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Edward Mcmurphy
26W–30L career · type S · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Don Eccles
24W–107L career · 5 lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
2.90
3
Berry Wanless
30W–30L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Charles Bonebrake
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
David Thurbon
2W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Don Hoffman
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Donald Arnold
4W–15L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lewis Lenard
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Underwood
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Rodney Bleich
9W–20L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Walter Trammell
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.